No you mean, 'you wanted yes to win', empty vessels make the most noise(I took that quote from some commentator). The silent responsible loyal majority don't need to shout from the rooftops their intentions.
No you mean, 'you wanted yes to win', empty vessels make the most noise(I took that quote from some commentator). The silent responsible loyal majority don't need to shout from the rooftops their intentions.
So Scotland decides to be England's bitch.
So Scotland decides to be England's bitch.
[FnG]magnolia;26924165 said:No Quebec this time, folks.
Westminster needs to deliver now, if not, they'll have 100% of us to fight against, not just half of us.
They won't. The don't have the mandate to give us anything.
If you voted no thinking Westminster will deliver sorry bud, you'll be waiting a while.
What does that mean, Quebec also voted no?
They won't. The don't have the mandate to give us anything.
If you voted no thinking Westminster will deliver sorry bud, you'll be waiting a while.
If they give more there will be a backlash in rest of UK who think it has gone much too far already
I voted No because I can do maths, proper maths, not the made up wishy washy maths that's been pedalled by the SNP for over 2 years.
No matter what the outcome was, it was going to change the make up of UK Politics and I still expect that to be the case with a No vote.
That's not going to happen given the size of the vote, and the fact that 45% of people would be left out in the cold. You cannot polarise the result as it will result in more problems.A vote for no was a vote to remain as is. If I voted no I would be annoyed that's the status quo was not upheld.
Now we just need an English Parliament in Winchester and the abandoning of the Barnet formula in exchange for more direct tax control for the Scottish parliament.![]()