The High-Res Screenshot Thread!

Bioshock%202007-08-21%2002-29-21-73.jpg
 
willhub said:
Is that game another UE3 game? I was judging bioshock by the screenshot's, looked naff on screenshots, jaggy as hell, when I've been playing it at 1440x900, I cant see much jaggies at all in Bioshock, I mean was having a hard time seeing if 2xAA worked, dont even need it lol. So I suspect it will be the same with MOH:A
AA works in Dx9 but not sure if it does with ATi cards yet.

I posted this in another thread;
6b2pzwg.jpg


http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9962243&postcount=38
 
Tripnologist said:
That actually looks loads better with AA. I thought it only supported AA in DX10?
Nah AA won't work in Dx10 but it does in 9!

I'd rather have the AA than slightly crisper shadows and better water.

Some more shots here if you haven't seen them already. (Down the page)
 
bioshock200708271445309ev2.jpg

bioshock200708271550449wl1.jpg


Couldn't get AA to work without crashing in that level for some reason!

I can't wait for my new monitor to arrive to run stuff in 1680x1050! :D
 
Finally I got some shots with Fraps saving to .png then converted to a higher quality jpeg.

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-49-20-17%20copy.JPG

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-52-06-76.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-55-06-60.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-55-41-89%20copy.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-58-11-56%20copy.JPG

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-58-38-57%20copy.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-58-54-51%20copy.JPG

Crysis%202007-11-11%2021-59-28-84.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2022-00-54-21.jpg

Crysis%202007-11-11%2022-01-15-01.jpg


For this, C2D@Stock, 8800GTX@Stock, 4GB Corsair@888Mhz, XP32, Very High cvars, 1680x1050
 
It would be better if on WoW you could actually see characters in the distance though, which you can't as it fades them out, at least when I played it did.
 
Back
Top Bottom