The Manchester United Club Thread **Sponsored by Comedy Central**

Amorim could win games just by playing a low block and hitting teams on the break. It’s pretty much what most of the team is used to playing yet it still got managers the sack. ETH realised the team couldn’t play an Ajax style so went to playing counterattacking football but when he got the players he wanted and worked with before, he couldn’t get the team to play how he wanted and got the sack. ETH played with a back four and played awful football and got called out by just about everyone saying he didn’t have a style of play.

Ineos decided to get in a manager who has a distinct style of play, if the team can’t play ETH ball in over 2 years despite a lot of the players being ex ETH players then what makes you think they can play Amorim ball in a few months, let alone years?
 
Are we really talking about Solksjær again?

If you look at his stats pre, during and post United, you can't draw a conclusion as to if he's a good manager or not.

United U21s 2.12pts per game
Molde 1.85
Cardiff 1.07
Molde 1.84
United (initial CTM role) 2.32
United (as FT manager) 1.79

His United managerial career, ignoring his initial caretaker manager role was very much in like with his stints at Molde...
 
Back
Top Bottom