• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
19 Oct 2013
Posts
293
Location
Kent
Just ran this benchmark as specified by OP, but something isnt right, firstly it looks really jittery, results were:

8320 @4.6
7990 @1150/1625
min - 15.1
max - 100.3
avg - 79.8

Why is my min so much lower than others who are getting similar max/avg scores?
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Nov 2005
Posts
24,845
Location
Guernsey
[[/spoiler]

1600p
Single GPU

1. Kaapstad - Titan @981/1788, ???. 42.5
2. Kaapstad - 690 (single core) @1200/1800, 320.18. 27.7
3.
4.
5.

Dual GPU


1. Kaapstad - Titan @981/1788, ???. 84.3
2. Kaapstad - 690 @1190/1800, 320.18. 55.8
3.
4.
5.

Triple GPU


1. whyscotty - Titan @1202/1802, 331.65. 125.8
2. Kaapstad - Titan @981/1788, ???. 123.6
3.
4.
5.

Quad GPU


1. Kaapstad - Titan @981/1788, ???. 162.9
2. Kaapstad - 690 @1160/1800, 331.65. 103.8
3.
4.
5.
WOW... Dual titans /Triple titans & Quad titans all scale ready great in this game...:eek:
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,280
Location
Essex innit!
It going get real interesting when one the R290x owners manages to get a 1300+ core speed....:D

I can't believe that Titans are still top in the 1080P, as this is an AMD game and TressFX loves AMD :D

Edit:

Just looked and Nvidia are top in all of them except for one (quad GPU's @ 1440P), which Catanonia is holding. Well done Cat for holding Team Red on your strong shoulders :p
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom