• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
24 May 2011
Posts
262
2600k @ 4.4Ghz
7990 @ 1000/1500
Driver - 13.9

2013_12_08_00001.jpg
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
41,035
Location
United Kingdom
2600k @ 4.4Ghz
7990 @ 1000/1500

2013_12_08_00001.jpg

Not bad matey, but you can do better. Update to the latest beta, 13.11 Beta 9.5. You need 1.1 more fps to tie with Kaap's overclocked 690. You can do it, just like me. :cool:

2700k@5ghz
7990@stock @1000/1500
13.11 Beta 9.4


1080p Benchmarks

Single 7990 core

kzvEHub.jpg


7990

6nTjeol.jpg



1440p Benchmarks

Single 7990 core

X1iN9sl.jpg


7990

iPoph2D.jpg


Scaling %

1080p-95% Scaling 1>2 GPU
1440p-99% Scaling 1>2 GPU
 
Associate
Joined
24 May 2011
Posts
262
Not bad matey, but you can do better. Update to the latest beta, 13.11 Beta 9.5. You need 1.1 more fps to tie with Kaap's overclocked 690. You can do it, just like me. :cool:

I updated and it's actually decreased. I'm now getting 92.8 :confused:
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
41,035
Location
United Kingdom
Updated.

Apologies for the delay and also if I've missed your post.

Petey you missed my dual gpu score at 1080p.

2700k@5ghz
7990@stock @1000/1500
13.11 Beta 9.4


1080p Benchmarks

Single 7990 core

kzvEHub.jpg


7990

6nTjeol.jpg



1440p Benchmarks

Single 7990 core

X1iN9sl.jpg


7990

iPoph2D.jpg


Scaling %

1080p-95% Scaling 1>2 GPU
1440p-99% Scaling 1>2 GPU
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
22 Jul 2012
Posts
15,897
Location
London
Good lad, now im beating that dirty Kaapalini. Fancy taking on my 7990 score with one of your two 7990's big boy? :D :p

I get the same min/max, but a whole 1fps lower average than you @1100/1650 with the cpu @4.4.
Perhaps the lack of a bios flash or something? I dunno. Not gonna bother doing that though :D
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
22 Jul 2012
Posts
15,897
Location
London
Considering mine is +100/150 on the clocks and 1fps behind, you're not doing too bad eh? :p

ED: I got 99 dead @1150/1700, but it locked up before I took a shot... Ah well.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
41,035
Location
United Kingdom
Considering mine is +100/150 on the clocks and 1fps behind, you're not doing too bad eh? :p

ED: I got 99 dead @1150/1700, but it locked up before I took a shot... Ah well.

Something ain't right there old boy. I will run a quick test now at 1150/1700. However don't enter this because this is just a quick run and i can likely do better if i spend some serious time on it. BRB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom