Massively. If you're a belt holder you should be forced to do at least a mandatory and a voluntary agaisnt a top 10 opponent a year. 2 as an absolute minimum.
I'm also of the opinion that we should rate the IBF belt above the WBC. It wont happen as the WBC has the prestige and history but Mauricio Sulaiman is such a slime-ball of a character. They'll make a pointless trinket for any event just to get some money, they allow champions like Charlo to go almost 2 years without defending his belt or not calling a heavyweight mandatory... Hell, how have they let Ruiz jr and Wilder pretend to negotiate for a final eliminator for a year. They should've given them a few weeks/months and if not, pick the 3rd and 4th ranked fighters.
The IBF don't mess around with their mandatories. Fight it or vacate.
I'm also of the opinion that we should rate the IBF belt above the WBC. It wont happen as the WBC has the prestige and history but Mauricio Sulaiman is such a slime-ball of a character. They'll make a pointless trinket for any event just to get some money, they allow champions like Charlo to go almost 2 years without defending his belt or not calling a heavyweight mandatory... Hell, how have they let Ruiz jr and Wilder pretend to negotiate for a final eliminator for a year. They should've given them a few weeks/months and if not, pick the 3rd and 4th ranked fighters.
The IBF don't mess around with their mandatories. Fight it or vacate.