*** The Official OCUK Cinebench R20 benchmark Thread ***

[humbug]

Yeah, I do think the board does have a little to do with it. Not saying you will be getting a huge boost if you changed to the board I have, but there is probably a good chance you would at least get a 100mhz all core boost.

I did Highlight - Right click Google Search the board in your signature, i like it, a new board has been on my mind even before i replaced the Ryzen 1600 but the delay of B550 boards has put a halt to that idea, i find it difficult to stomach £200+ on a board for a £180 CPU.

I've even considered going high end B450 or mid X470 with the prices on those now being quite reasonable but i know if i did that B550's will land soon after and i would kick myself.

I'll wait a bit more...

 

[humbug]

And there's me considering the ASRock watercooled board and a 3950X when it launches.

That $999 glorious monstrosity? DO IT!!!!

Got my board for £189 myself. The thought is some years down the line to pop in a cheap 12-16 core 4000 series from members market as people sell up to go for the 5000 or 6000 series

That's a pretty good idea.

 

[humbug]

Yes indeed that one (it's £950 on OcUK) as well as 128 GB of RAM if I can find the DIMMs and use it as an extension to my homelab as well as for gaming. It's eye wateringly expensive though so I think I'll stick my my 8086k for now. Still very tempting!

Yeah its a stupid board, a gloriously stupid board but if you've got that much money to burn on epeen... i would! Because shiny.

 

[humbug]

It just makes things easier when running a custom loop. I don't have to worry about chipset cooling, plus I have a 10 Gbit network at home so the 10 Gbit adaptor is a bonus (but not necessary as I have a PCI card).

It sure does that.
For those who don't know what we are talking about, its this ridiculous thing, you'll put your back out just lifting it off the desk.

 

[humbug]

I know we have to put up with him every night in discord.

You'd be lost without me moose

 

[humbug]

@TNA you still beat your old MT score by about 50 points so i have updated your score.

@Shac you're now #10 in ST

Impressive scores guys, not to blather on about "AMD fine wine" from the GPU room but these Zen 2 chips just keep getting better as they mature.

I installed the 1usmus Ryzen Power Plan myself and i'm getting 481 without doing anything to it now, the score i have posted here is 486 and that's locked to 4.2Ghz so i think its safe to say my 3600 is now boosting to 4.2Ghz at default. :happy:

 

[humbug]

Thanks humbug. Will have another crack at taking Shac’s spot once my new RAM arrives

By the way. My 4041 MT results was with 4.5GHz, you put it down as 4.4GHz

Fixed. its just that you said...

FYI, ignore the all core result. That was from a 4.4GHz all core test I did before running the 4.65GHz single core OC. The PC had restarted from trying to run 4.7GHz so I wanted to make sure all was still well by running that 4.4GHz run

 

[humbug]

That was for the 2nd image as it had a lower score on it. The 1st image with the 4041 score is 4.5GHz

My bad, I should have been more clear really.

Ok mate

 

[humbug]

BTW guys, you need 5Ghz to beat RSR's monster 5.45Ghz 9900K .

 

[humbug]

No chance. Haha

Would need liquid nitrogen or something for that. Only people I see having a shot using air/water are people buying the 3950X soon. Even then I can’t see it.

Will be interesting to see if the 4000 series can do 5GHz when OC’d though.

Yeah its not happening, unless the 3950X silicon is that much better, which i highly doubt.

Ryzen 4000 is rumoured to get an 8% IPC increase and a 200Mhz boost in clocks, if true that will do it, hell that could break the 600 mark.

Looking further into the future i think high clocks are going to be a thing of the past, we are getting to a stage now where the silicon is so dense its difficult to keep them stable at high speed, Ask Intel about that with their 10nm, its been in operation for a couple of years and they are still struggling to get 4Ghz.
I think AMD did remarkably well to get in the 4.4 to 4.6Ghz range with a less than 1 year old 7nm, and these are high IPC chips.

From 5nm and then on IMO clocks are going to start to fall back a little at a time, from then on it will all be about IPC.

 

[humbug]

Unlike you

No, but i have some catching up to do

 

[humbug]

@humbug
None of the post links work properly as you haven't used the permalinks.

What do you mean permalinks? i use the links that you get from clicking on the post count number on the right, for example https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...nchmark-thread.18849380/page-31#post-33136593

@humbug Shac used 4.65GHz to get his ST score, you put it down as 4.6GHz.

Fixed, thanks

 

[humbug]

A lot of them just take me to the last page or the page (not post) that you have linked (which won't be the same for everyone).

Using the post number permalink I get this as an example: https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/33136593/

Edit: Are you actually clicking on the post number and then copying the permalink or right-clicking and copying link location (which will not work properly).

Right click on past number open in new tab, copy link out of tab.

I'll go though the links but i have a feeling the forum software borks some links over time.

 

[humbug]

Ok, how do you get to the Permalink? when i right click on a link i don't get a permalink option, is that a browser specific thing? i use Firefox.

 

[humbug]

Just click the on the post number and you get this:

I see, ok, i'll updated the links when i have time, its a lot of work.

Thanks

 

[humbug]

Where the scores are the same the later submission gets the higher spot, it encourages the previous submission to try and beat it

@TNA you're now #10

 

[humbug]

So All i have to do is post another run at the same score and as a newer entry i take the spot back... ad infinitum.
@humbug your gonna be very busy

Humbug you may regret that rule!

@TNA looks like you have a better core anyway as I already know only one of mine can do 4.75 even at 1.5V.

That's just trolling, doesn't count

 

[humbug]

Updated

 

[humbug]

He must be very happy now

He should not get too comfortable there though. I'll be back

Do you not think that desktop (9900k, 3900X etc) should have a separate table to HEDT stuff like TR?

TBH i have worried about this, more than just HEDT... at least on the MT, once the 3950X gets here its just going to be a wall of of Ryzen on the MT table, i don't want this to become "The Ryzen Benchmark Thread", much like some of the Threads in the GPU room are just a wall of green.

At the same time i don't want to overcomplicate the thread, so i don't know what to do, i'm open to suggestions

 

[humbug]

I have my old Ryzen 1600 result on post #2 https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/32563321/ that i could purpose for something, i'm thinking maybe a separate HEDT and a top 10 MT by core count, 4 core, 6 core, 8 core, 10 core when Intel pull their finger out of their arse, 12 core and 16 core.... not thread count given AMD don't do 6c 6t or 8c 8t, and i'm not doing +10 tables for them, if you can't get in the top 10 you don't get on the board, its just too much to put in a post.

What do you guys think?