Yes I am not actual interested in any speculative arguments, not making them, the indictment is an accusation. All my discussion is limited to one point. Dowie is claiming x and claiming this is what the F.B.I concluded.
Which if true would mean the D.O.J could not have brought the charge. Simple observation, requires no speculation, actually its blindingly obvious.
Have you considered that the FBI and DOJ can disagree regarding the approach to getting a conviction here, given the list of counts and possible ways of making each stick play out in court?
Likewise FBI can conclude that there is limited evidence for central coordination of the capitol riot as a whole, while having enough testimony and self-incriminating interviews by OK members looking for a platform to go for Seditious Conspiracy. There's no contradiction here. Hence the DOJ brings concrete charges against the 10 OK members with focus on sedition, as per the indictment, and lesser charges against the disorderly throng of people present.
Could you explain how proving that 10 OK members are guilty of seditious conspiracy prove that the mob as a whole was centrally coordinated?