This 'sugar tax' crap is doing my head in!

I think companies may see their profits nosedive.
Four days ago my wife bought a box of ice lollies for the children. The lollies would be normally be consumed within three days with the empty box residing in the freezer. I checked the freezer today and there are plenty of lollies still in the box, undisturbed. I asked the children if they were enjoying the ice lollies. Responses ranged from; "the're not sweet enough." "the lollies are smaller now." "Daddy I had to eat two." "I don't like it."
Looks like the sugar tax is kicking in.

What on earth are you talking about?
The tax applies to fizzy drinks with a sugar content higher than certain values of g/L.
It is nothing to do with ice lollies.
There has been no tax nor no proposed tax on ice lollies.
 
Just another stealth tax, they care not about obesity.. Full sugar coke still flying off the shelves where I work, diet and zero varieties hardly move. It's actually not uncommon for us to have diet coke go out of date because it just doesn't sell.

yeah i'm seeing stacks of diet that are hardly touched, i think the only reason the coke zero is being sold is by shoppers who think it's the normal coke since zero now has a red label when it used to be black
 
What on earth are you talking about?
The tax applies to fizzy drinks with a sugar content higher than certain values of g/L.
It is nothing to do with ice lollies.
There has been no tax nor no proposed tax on ice lollies.
The ice lolly wrapper stated no added sugar.
This was not evident in previous purchases of the same ice lolly
 
yeah i'm seeing stacks of diet that are hardly touched, i think the only reason the coke zero is being sold is by shoppers who think it's the normal coke since zero now has a red label when it used to be black
It's still black and red, but they increased the proportion of red and put a massive "ZERO SUGAR" label across it.

I think people buy Coke Zero because they want to buy Coke Zero. It doesn't taste anything like Diet Coke.
 
It's still black and red, but they increased the proportion of red and put a massive "ZERO SUGAR" label across it.

I think people buy Coke Zero because they want to buy Coke Zero. It doesn't taste anything like Diet Coke.

No they changed the name its no longer coke zero.

It's now coke zero sugar.
 
It's still black and red, but they increased the proportion of red and put a massive "ZERO SUGAR" label across it.

I think people buy Coke Zero because they want to buy Coke Zero. It doesn't taste anything like Diet Coke.
This, I actually prefer the taste of coke zero and Pepsi max, and don't mind diet coke at a push.
 
As said above sugar does not make you fat.

Its ridiculous, went the pub the other day and it would have been cheaper to buy my daughter a half of larger than a glass of coke.

Sugar tax is a really stupid idea, I make sure my daughter drinks full fat milk and full fat coke and lemonade. Shes fit as a fiddle has better abs than most of us on here.
 
As said above sugar does not make you fat.

Its ridiculous, went the pub the other day and it would have been cheaper to buy my daughter a half of larger than a glass of coke.

Sugar tax is a really stupid idea, I make sure my daughter drinks full fat milk and full fat coke and lemonade. Shes fit as a fiddle has better abs than most of us on here.
Way to miss the entire point of the tax, haha.
 
Regular cans of coke have gone up from £1.10 to £1.40 where I work. I prefer it over the other varieties.
 
i think the only reason the coke zero is being sold is by shoppers who think it's the normal coke since zero now has a red label when it used to be black
Vanilla and Cherry both saw increases in sales too back when Coke switched them to the "red label with a small hint it's not regular" system lol.
 
Regular cans of coke have gone up from £1.10 to £1.40 where I work. I prefer it over the other varieties.

So a rip-off merchant has become even more of a rip-off merchant because they can. No surprises there.

Any place that charges more than 50p for a can of flavoured fizzy sugar syrup is pushing it. Any place that charges more than £1 is taking the mickey.

Pubs and bars always seem to massively overcharge on what is essentially watered down coke anyway, so i'm not surprised itchy...

The markup is so farcical that it's beaten only by illegal drugs. The supplier marks it up by a silly amount and then the retailer marks up the marked up price by another silly amount. It's probably reached 1000% markup by the time a customer buys it.
 
It's only mildly acceptable if you're buying a mixer filled with copious amounts of spirit, but the 50-100ml you get is still like 4 times as expensive.
 
Went to Sainsburys for lunch and was quite shocked at how the drinks aisle has transformed so quickly.

The Cocacola "classic" was sitting there almost untouched (perhaps due to it's new higher price, perhaps due to it's new stigma) flanked by the new "zero sugar" variants of classic, peach, vanilla, cherry and finally Diet Coke (Classic variants of Cherry and Vanilla were noticeable by their absence). Nearby Pepsi sat also virtually untouched, flanked by the virtually sold out Pepsi Max.

Could we be witnessing the start of a seismic shift in the cola industry? (at least for the UK).

For years, nay forever there has been a set hierarchy in cola: Cocacola #1, Pepsi #2. Now with sugared variants of both brands losing market share due to the tax and the increasing stigma could this spell trouble for Cocacola? With focus shifting to the non-sugared variants this leaves them with Diet Coke, for decades marketed specifically to women to the point where most men consider it feminine Coke, and with Coke Zero (Now being marketed instead as Zero Sugar Coke). This leaves Coke with a problem because Coke Zero was a product that existed simply to fill a market segment, Pepsi had Pepsi Max and so Coke needed something to oppose it.

After years of Pepsi being #2 and being viewed by the public as #2 it seems the shoe is now on the other foot, because when it comes to non-sugared cola Pepsi are #1 and are viewed by most as #1 due to Coke never showing real interest in the market. To add insult to injury Diet Pepsi is seen my many as a worthy competitor to Diet Coke simply by virtue of naming scheme, perhaps this is why Coke have tried desperately to renounce the weak Coke Zero brand and repackage it simply as a sugar free variant of the more valued "Coke" brand (and to make a bad situation worse they also reformulated it as part of the deal, resulting in a product that in blind tests is viewed by many as inferior to both it's predecessor and Pepsi Max).

The times they be a changing.
 
Went to Sainsburys for lunch and was quite shocked at how the drinks aisle has transformed so quickly.

The Cocacola "classic" was sitting there almost untouched (perhaps due to it's new higher price, perhaps due to it's new stigma) flanked by the new "zero sugar" variants of classic, peach, vanilla, cherry and finally Diet Coke (Classic variants of Cherry and Vanilla were noticeable by their absence). Nearby Pepsi sat also virtually untouched, flanked by the virtually sold out Pepsi Max.

went to morrisons on saturday. not a single Coke full sugar or Pepsi full sugar in store. the aisle only had sugar free versions left, which are nasty imo and even more nasty when using as a mixer drink. my take is people are not switching over to sugar free versions. only when forced to.

i hate for instance that subway have completely removed pepsi from the dispenser. i'm left now with pepsi diet, pepsi diet cherry, 7up diet, or a mix of sugar and sweetener orange tango. all nasty. before a footlong could cost £5 with a drink. now it's £4.90 without a drink, or go next door to mcd and get a coke for £1.40 so £6.30 for what was costing £5.

give me the choice. I'll pay the extra 20p ffs. but because they've got rid of it all together i'm stuck.
 
Well done, they have ****ing ruined Sprite now. Tastes like ****. Sprite was my favourite fizzy drink but no we can't have the same ingredients anymore!!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom