To Stripe or not to Stripe? Hmmm

Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2004
Posts
1,230
Hey guys, Just got my lovely Fiesta ST this week and enjoying it a lot.

When I got it, it came with none of the additional stripes (over the top or side)

Im thinking about adding side stripes, but I cant make up my mind. Which do you think looks better? Mine is the same colour as this one by the way!

fiestaST72.jpg


OR

startside.jpg
 
Last edited:
Unlight said:
Sorry the image function doesnt appear to want to show the pics. Added direct links now..

Links want to be gay.
Use imageshack please :)
 
Needs stripes mate :) I would go the whole hog get the bonnet / roof ones too :)

Sam
 
Just copy and paste the link that the link links to and the photos work.
 
is the fiesta the one with the fat double stripes right up the bonnet and over the roof? If so get 'em applied now.

I'm not one for adding bonus stripes normally but foprds with fat double stripes just looks right somehow.

HT
 
If its blue (I can't see any pics) then go for it. (blue car with white stripes imo looks very nice indeed)

Edit I see the pictures now. (damn the slow connection at work)

I would go for the two white stripes up the car.
 
Slightly worse pictures now applied.

Im not too keen on getting the over the top stripes fitted, as Im quite worried that it'll attract too much of the wrong attention...
 
Sides maybe. I wouldn't go over the top. Top stripes are reserved exclusively for Mustangs and Vipers and other muscle cars.


Stripes are supposed to mean:


"I have enough litres under this bonnet to drain a swimmingpool in 10 seconds flat"

Not.

"Hear my 2.0 whine"
 
Last edited:
No they're not, They come like that as standard, I would defo get the whole bonnet/roof stripes on, it suits the car. Chav? Hardly.
 
Unless it's a worthy car, stripes are ghey. And I'm talking about the likes of Ford GT's, not Fiestas.

They only come standard on low end cars as there is a market for chav-mobiles, not because it looks good or the car is worthy.
 
Back
Top Bottom