But what I am arguing is that with a strong enough moral code and appropriate behaviour for a civilised society, humans should be able to handle those hormones. If not, then why do we treat other hormone imbalances, and ignore these if the results can be so horrific?! (rhetorical, I know why and I agree).
A child that has these "genes" brought up in a good, attentive and loving household stands a much better chance of developing behaviour and morals that control those desires. The decision then will be made consciously to commit a crime if you know right from wrong and in knowing that if caught, punished by the state. If you don't know right from wrong, and have no morals, then no decision is made, it is simply an instinctive response to hormonal desire; I see this as animalistic, and that scares me both in terms of a human being driven by instinct instead of morals, and my viewing them as "animals". They aren't animals, they have just been failed in terms of having good morals instilled, or alternatively failed and broken morals instilled through radicalisation - which begs the question, do rapists self-radicalise to justify the crime?
Just thinking about this and partaking in this discussion makes me incredibly uncomfortable I have to admit.