Ubuntu Live Cd's for Ps3 now available for download

anyone going to try this?

i keep thinking about Linux on the system but I don't know if I can bring myself to lay ethernet from my router to the PS3.
 
n3crius said:
anyone going to try this?

i keep thinking about Linux on the system but I don't know if I can bring myself to lay ethernet from my router to the PS3.

Aye, that's the only thing that's putting me off. My wireless router is in my back bedroom :(
 
Skyfall said:
Can I ask.. Maybe its obvious... But why would you want to run linux on the PS3?


handy for those that don't want a pc, or have a pc and don't want to switch it on to browse the internet, e-mail, listen to music, watch films, play emulators, work on speadsheets, ect, ect. Basically its a pc on your HDTV setup, using the Firefox browser compared to Sonys own is worthwhile in itself ~(i find the ps3 browser abit clunky and awkard to navigate). Also has built in torrent cilent for grabbing your music files, ect,ect.

and i think that because this is the 1st Live Cd you get automatic updates compared to Yellowdog, so now messing about with installing updates as it does it al for you
 
McManicMan said:
handy for those that don't want a pc, or have a pc and don't want to switch it on to browse the internet

Thats all I want it for really. Music I run through Media Connect on the 360 so I'm not bothered about that. Just a pain at the mo as there are no drivers for wireless.
I've got a pair of them homeplug things though. Suppose I could use them as they'd be fast enough for just browsing the internet.
 
rp2000 said:
What does this mean to non Linux people like me?

I guess this means it is just a different front end once it is installed? :confused:


rp2000
It's a bit more than just the front end... Linux is really just the kernel of the OS, so all distros use the same kernel, but they're free to change the other parts.

The different GUI would really be due to the different so-called Desktop Environments, so you could have Yellow Dog Linux running KDE looking different to a Yellow Dog Linux running Gnome or one running Xfce. They're the same OS underneath, but the GUI makes them look different.

This is possible because the Desktop Environment is completely separated from the kernel... as opposed to Windows, for example, where it's all lumped together, and although you can configure Windows to look how you want it it's still the same GUI from one Windows box to another (it's just the dekstop background that changes, or the colour of dialog boxes, etc...).

However, there are differences between various distros... for example, distros based on the Debian release, such as Ubuntu, use the apt-get package management solution, whereas other distros use something different (RedHat & Fedora use the RPM system, Gentoo uses the emerge system, etc...).

But, there are kernel-specific things that are similar across all distros... e.g. the file system is mostly consistent (all distros have the same hierarchical layout, e.g. /home is always the "My Documents" folder) and most of the commands are common (you can always use grep or ps or rm -rf * on a Linux distro).

Hope that makes sense.
 
GarethDW said:
It's a bit more than just the front end... Linux is really just the kernel of the OS, so all distros use the same kernel, but they're free to change the other parts.

The different GUI would really be due to the different so-called Desktop Environments, so you could have Yellow Dog Linux running KDE looking different to a Yellow Dog Linux running Gnome or one running Xfce. They're the same OS underneath, but the GUI makes them look different.

This is possible because the Desktop Environment is completely separated from the kernel... as opposed to Windows, for example, where it's all lumped together, and although you can configure Windows to look how you want it it's still the same GUI from one Windows box to another (it's just the dekstop background that changes, or the colour of dialog boxes, etc...).

However, there are differences between various distros... for example, distros based on the Debian release, such as Ubuntu, use the apt-get package management solution, whereas other distros use something different (RedHat & Fedora use the RPM system, Gentoo uses the emerge system, etc...).

But, there are kernel-specific things that are similar across all distros... e.g. the file system is mostly consistent (all distros have the same hierarchical layout, e.g. /home is always the "My Documents" folder) and most of the commands are common (you can always use grep or ps or rm -rf * on a Linux distro).

Hope that makes sense.


Yes, makes sense. Have you used both Ubuntu and YDl to compare? (on PS3 or otherwise?).



rp2000
 
I've not used YDL (hadn't heard of it until the PS3 was released) but have used Ubuntu on my PC at home... I don't personally get on with Ubuntu, although at the moment I'm using Debian which is what Ubuntu is a flavour of.

Ubuntu is extremely popular though, so I wouldn't read too much into the fact that I don't like it ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom