UEFA Champions League/Europa League 8/9/10 March *** Spoilers ***

Shopping vs your team in CL at Nou Camp.

Does not compute.

Well seeing as i knew we were going to be dumped out, which we have been now...i think it was for the best that i was out or else my blood pressure would have gone straight through the roof;)...its all good though....we did well to have gone to Barca with a slender lead but i couldnt see us hanging on for a win especially after going down to 10 men.

Shame really as i was hoping we could have beaten Barca at home but barring a miracle i couldnt see it happening even though i havent watched any of the game ie highlights.

Ahh well always next yr but as usual we will be dumped out in semi's or before the semi's:p....unless Wenger gets rid of the deadwood currently infecting our squad but that happening is as likely as me winning the lottery ie virutally nil.
 
One word - Women.

:(

Yep exactly...got my sis in law from Canada visiting us till next fri and shes most definitely a shopaholic...tonight im off again to Lakeside for some more shopping....oh well keeps my mind off our defeat last night and keeps me occupied as i just recently split up with the fiancee and its not easy...the more distractions the better:p.
 
Sorry really disagree. RVP did nothing other then argue and be a bit mouthy in the first half, must have had less then 10 touches and Arsenal could barely string 3/4 passes together let alone counter attack. They were sitting off Barca far too much.

Had Arsenal had 11 I still think the score would have being similar.

I think it's very arrogant of Wenger, it's just deflecting the wrath off the players (who showed in the first leg they could do something) which most managers should do. I suppose.

I'm really surprised, I usually think you talk a lot of sense in your posts but this just suggests a dislike for Arsenal rather than looking at the bigger picture.

Arsenal did right to stand of Barcelona. You keep your shape and make them have to work for the gaps in between your defensive lines. If you close down like Barcelona do when they are high up the pitch, you leave spaces. Barcelona will exploit any spaces that you leave. So closing them down like I think you're suggesting would have been suicidal and played right into their hands.

First half, Barcelona pressed very high up the pitch and unsettled Arsenal and yes, Arsenal were left looking extremely ordinary because of it. Any side in the world would have. Its the second half that I would have expected Arsenal to start to come out of their shell a bit more as the Barcelona players tire from all of the constant pressing high up the pitch leaving spaces in behind.

Van Persie getting sent off meant Barcelona could afford to commit more forward without having to worry about Arsenal's only outlet that could hold it up and bring other players into a counter attack.

Arsenal rode their luck at times but any hopes they did have went off the pitch with Van Persie.
 
[ASSE]Hinchy;18631776 said:
How many times have Arsenal dominated a team like Barcelona did today, only to go and lose 1-0 and people turn around and say "The other team deserved that, Arsenal don't deserve to win if they don't take their chances...". Then when Arsenal play with the tactics of that other team, they are laughed at for the stats?

The problem is, for every non Arsenal fan that may have defended smaller sides for playing defensive football against Arsenal, there's an Arsenal fan that has hammered them for playing 'anti football' and in some cases made silly claims liked they'd rather lose than play that sort of football.

It's pretty obvious that when Arsenal end up resorting to a style of play that a section of their fans are so critical of, it's going to be thrown back in their faces.

My personal opinion is that Arsenal should have gone the whole hog and stuck Bentdner/Chamahk up front with Arshavin and hit long balls aswell as defending in numbers.

And going by some of the posts in here towards the end of the game when Barca wasted a few chances, had Bentdner scored towards the end and knocked Barca out, there would have been plenty of people saying Barca deserved nothing too.
 
Tummy doesn't dislike Arsenal he's usually very complimentary to be fair. It's fair enough if he has a different opinion but I really do think there was a massive change in the game as soon as RvP went off, I thought it was really obvious, they pushed up so far and the whole dynamic of the game changed.
 
[ASSE]Hinchy;18632367 said:
I'm really surprised, I usually think you talk a lot of sense in your posts but this just suggests a dislike for Arsenal rather than looking at the bigger picture.

Arsenal did right to stand of Barcelona. You keep your shape and make them have to work for the gaps in between your defensive lines. If you close down like Barcelona do when they are high up the pitch, you leave spaces. Barcelona will exploit any spaces that you leave. So closing them down like I think you're suggesting would have been suicidal and played right into their hands.

First half, Barcelona pressed very high up the pitch and unsettled Arsenal and yes, Arsenal were left looking extremely ordinary because of it. Any side in the world would have. Its the second half that I would have expected Arsenal to start to come out of their shell a bit more as the Barcelona players tire from all of the constant pressing high up the pitch leaving spaces in behind.

Van Persie getting sent off meant Barcelona could afford to commit more forward without having to worry about Arsenal's only outlet that could hold it up and bring other players into a counter attack.

Arsenal rode their luck at times but any hopes they did have went off the pitch with Van Persie.

Is this even a joke, standing off them, like Diaby did, just let them stand inside our half, still without being closed down as Pedro/Messi/Iniesta ran along the back line and waited for a pass in behind, thats how we conceded two at home last season, thats EXACTLY how we conceded those goals and Barca created a half dozen chances from that in the first half alone.

Our gameplan was working, lol, the first leg, despite Arsenal fans forgetting, was around 64-65% posession for Barca, we stood off them, they scored and had another bad night infront of goal, in the second half when we dominated them we pushed forwards, we closed them down, we most certainly in no way "stood off them" standing off them is EXACTLY what lets Barca play their football, getting in their faces and in their half especially is exactly what made them screw up passes and lose posession.

Everything you said is literally 100% incorrect, gameplan, Cesc was injured and unable to run, Diaby was unwilling to run, tackle, pass, close track runs, or really do anything. Thats not a game plan, thats an absolute failure, we played into their hands completely.

Jakeke, seriously, our gameplan was working at 1-1 and only after RVP was sent off did they commit two men forwards, utter utter utter tripe.

Alves didn't get forwards till RVP was sent off, is that really the story you're going with, until RVP, who had no posession, none of the ball, won no headers and was literally no threat at all with no support, went off they were barely attacking or playing their game. Rubbish, we played into their hands from start to finish, we never looked like scoring, but for an absolute fluke goal 100% against the run of play, scored by a ridiculous own goal we'd have been several goals down before the sending off.

Yes, Arsenal still could have won, thats football, but at no stage, not even for a second were we in control of that tie. The way we played, the space they had, the amount of times they shot and got in the box it was completely inevitable they would score more goals.


But lets hope the majority of Arsenal fans continue with the "ref stole it from us" mantra, so no one gets angry at the retarded Wenger who made every single wrong decision on the night, starting line up, tactics, subs. Wenger needs to go, these games go the SAME WAY every single ruddy time, for 5 years, and Wenger hasn't learnt from a single one of these games, he hasn't learnt from a single "play injured player and watch it backfire" mistake he's made of which the last 5 seasons are littered with dozens.

Wenger out, competant manager with some balls and less excuses in, Arsenal have a squad that can win things.
 
Arsenal were too tired in the second half after sitting off and chasing shadows.

Arsenal were really good in the first leg, they needed to play a similar system (I understand it's AT Barca) but you needed to be more in their faces and press them more, Arsenal simply let them walk it into their half. Press them, force them back.

I do take the point that you could have opened yourself up leaving space, but you did it well enough at times in the first leg. It works, Barca weren't at there best last night, it was there to be exploited. Their usual midfield was out, their centre back partnership contained a full back and a midfielder.

I also think Wenger got it wrong from the off, Leaving pacey and tricky Arshavin on the bench? having him and RVP break away (without theo as he was injured) would have scared Barca. It looked at first glance like Wenger wanted to try and shut out Barca. It's never going to work, watch Spanish teams play them week in week out.

I really felt like Arsenal missed a chance to surprise Barca (like they did in the first leg) and go for them a bit, press them and hassle them. I'd of gone the other way, and in the second half made sure Arsenal were more compact as Arsenal were tiring.

The mental battle was lost when the teams were announced, no real threat up top with just RVP there and a tight packed midfield. Arsenal are a team that are capable of being better then that on any pitch anywhere.

The game was killed off when RVP went off, I agree with that but I don't think Arsenal showed enough in the first half to suggest they'd have done any better with him on the pitch. Arshavin should have started. In all honesty Arsenal had some horrible injuries pre game as well which can't of helped.
 
Tummy doesn't dislike Arsenal he's usually very complimentary to be fair. It's fair enough if he has a different opinion but I really do think there was a massive change in the game as soon as RvP went off, I thought it was really obvious, they pushed up so far and the whole dynamic of the game changed.

It didn't, RVP had none of the ball, at all, we didn't get it to him AT ALL throughout the game.

They spent 80% of the game camped in our half, of which a huge amount of that was in our final third, of which a huge amount ended up in chances. The only thing that changed was in the final 10-15 minutes we pushed forwards marginally, and left more and more gaps in behind, thats because we were chasing the game, something we'd have done with or without RVP, the utter lack of quality is what prevented chances in the first 80 minutes and the final 10.

The dynamic start to finish was Barca strolling through midfield unopposed, sitting in our half and making passes in behind the defence whenever the heck they wanted.

Djourou and Kos made HUGE mistakes for some of the goals, and some other times, but they also made a HUGE number of last ditch tackles and desparate defending which prevented chances, as such overall both did ok, two worse defenders and they'd have had twice the shots and many more goals.
 
[ASSE]Hinchy;18632367 said:
I'm really surprised, I usually think you talk a lot of sense in your posts but this just suggests a dislike for Arsenal rather than looking at the bigger picture.

Arsenal did right to stand of Barcelona. You keep your shape and make them have to work for the gaps in between your defensive lines. If you close down like Barcelona do when they are high up the pitch, you leave spaces. Barcelona will exploit any spaces that you leave. So closing them down like I think you're suggesting would have been suicidal and played right into their hands.

First half, Barcelona pressed very high up the pitch and unsettled Arsenal and yes, Arsenal were left looking extremely ordinary because of it. Any side in the world would have. Its the second half that I would have expected Arsenal to start to come out of their shell a bit more as the Barcelona players tire from all of the constant pressing high up the pitch leaving spaces in behind.

Van Persie getting sent off meant Barcelona could afford to commit more forward without having to worry about Arsenal's only outlet that could hold it up and bring other players into a counter attack.

Arsenal rode their luck at times but any hopes they did have went off the pitch with Van Persie.

Obviously Van Persie going off made things harder but this idea that Barca would have began to tire and Arsenal may have been able to take advantage towards the end of the game is simply wrong imo.

With or without Van Persie, Arsenal had no outlet. Everytime the ball got cleared, Barca won it back within seconds and started another attack. The pattern of the game didn't change with the sending off, the only thing that changed is like you said, Barca could push an extra man forward. Arsenal players were chasing shadows all game and it was always going to be the Arsenal players that tired first.

With Van Persie as your outlet, playing the way Arsenal did was suicide imo. Not even the strongest defenses are capable of holding Barca out for 90 minutes let alone Arsenals. If Arsenal were going to play that way they needed pace and/or a physical presense in attack, they had neither though.

I completely disagree with your view about it being suicide to press Barca high up the pitch too. Look at the 2nd leg between Chelsea and Barca from the other season; Chelsea took the game to Barca, pressed them high up the pitch and although they ended up getting knocked out, they could and probably should have won quite comfortably. Liverpool used the same tactics in 2007 and deservedly won in the Nou Camp and lost the return leg 1-0 but like Chelsea, should have beaten them convincingly that day. You're right when you say that Barca could pick you apart if you press them; they're the best team on the planet and if they play to their best, you're always going to lose but they're not perfect. Even with their first choice defense, they're not the best at the back and the best chance of you've got is to exploit that. It's a brave thing to do though because you could be on the end of a hammering if you do though.
 
Also, I don't dislike Arsenal. I judge teams by how they play their football and the tactics they employ. Arsenal play good football, and after the first leg thought this was setting up to be a European night to remember.

The only clubs I dislike are Sheffield United :p
 
Obviously Van Persie going off made things harder but this idea that Barca would have began to tire and Arsenal may have been able to take advantage towards the end of the game is simply wrong imo.

With or without Van Persie, Arsenal had no outlet. Everytime the ball got cleared, Barca won it back within seconds and started another attack. The pattern of the game didn't change with the sending off, the only thing that changed is like you said, Barca could push an extra man forward. Arsenal players were chasing shadows all game and it was always going to be the Arsenal players that tired first.

With Van Persie as your outlet, playing the way Arsenal did was suicide imo. Not even the strongest defenses are capable of holding Barca out for 90 minutes let alone Arsenals. If Arsenal were going to play that way they needed pace and/or a physical presense in attack, they had neither though.

I completely disagree with your view about it being suicide to press Barca high up the pitch too. Look at the 2nd leg between Chelsea and Barca from the other season; Chelsea took the game to Barca, pressed them high up the pitch and although they ended up getting knocked out, they could and probably should have won quite comfortably. Liverpool used the same tactics in 2007 and deservedly won in the Nou Camp and lost the return leg 1-0 but like Chelsea, should have beaten them convincingly that day. You're right when you say that Barca could pick you apart if you press them; they're the best team on the planet and if they play to their best, you're always going to lose but they're not perfect. Even with their first choice defense, they're not the best at the back and the best chance of you've got is to exploit that. It's a brave thing to do though because you could be on the end of a hammering if you do though.

Only really replying and adding to that last paragraph. That's the point I was trying to make. This is a European cup tie, you can't sit off a team like Barca and expect to sneak something. Get in their faces, attack the, pressure them, counter attack with pace against them. Liverpool and as rightly said Chelsea did this and one worked and one didn't. Try things. It's about having big balls.

Arsenal didn't have the balls to go out there and try and play football against Barca, to take the game to them. It's a mental battle, too many teams go to Barca with a fear. Arsenal need bigger balls.
 
I'm amazed Arsenal or Arsene are being blamed at all for last night. We were simply beaten by the best, no shame in that. It's easy to say more effort this and closing down that, but ultimately this was Barcelona at home.

As for the refereeing decision. It did change the game. Up until that point how many crucial saves did our goalies have to make? I remember thinking to myself that for all of the possession they had they haven't had a clear chance. It all came after the sending off. I still think we would have gone out however.

It's a real shame to listen to the idiot supporters we have adopted since Arsene came in. On Saturday there was some booing after the game. The team have just lost a final (its a final, can happen to anyone) and we had the game against Barca coming up in a few days and people were booing. What must that do to the morale of the team? Absolute disgrace.

A small part of me wishes we went on to have a shocker for the rest of the season so maybe we will lose some of these people. I don't think they would go though as the moaning seems to be the reason they follow the club.
 
That's not arrogant from Wenger at all, it was 1 - 1 and they didn't really look like scoring, Arsenal were in position to go through :s For all their possession, they made very few clear cut chances vs 11 men

Utter utter rubbish, the only team that didn't look like scoring was Arsenal remember it was an OG that gave you your goal. Barca opened you up time and time again and had it not been for some good saves and some poor final passes they'd have scored a bucket load

Always the same with Arsenal, last season they blamed their defeat to Barca due to their injuries this year it's refereeing decisions despite a long list over the two legs that went for them
 
Utter utter rubbish, the only team that didn't look like scoring was Arsenal remember it was an OG that gave you your goal. Barca opened you up time and time again and had it not been for some good saves and some poor final passes they'd have scored a bucket load

Always the same with Arsenal, last season they blamed their defeat to Barca due to their injuries this year it's refereeing decisions despite a long list over the two legs that went for them

That's rubbish. When you say Arsenal who do you mean? The injuries of course have an effect and its wrong to discount them but to say Arsenal blamed it on them is a bit general.

Bit like other teams blaming everything on the ref I suppose.

We were beaten by a better team last season and this.
 
Always the same with Arsenal, last season they blamed their defeat to Barca due to their injuries this year it's refereeing decisions despite a long list over the two legs that went for them

It's the same with any team. Whenever a side loses you get a section of their support that will put the focus on the decision(s) that went against them and ignore the decision(s) that went for them.

To say Barca didn't look like scoring is lunacy though.
 
Out of curiousity, can people name 2 or 3 clear cut chances they had in the first half? I was hammered, I actually can't. The post was a half chance I suppose, I just can't remember any more. Assuming you score 1 in 3 chances, I really don't think they looked like running away with it in the first half. The goal was a stupid mistake by Fabregas and the whole defence were left unawares
 
Out of curiousity, can people name 2 or 3 clear cut chances they had in the first half? I was hammered, I actually can't. The post was a half chance I suppose, I just can't remember any more. Assuming you score 1 in 3 chances, I really don't think they looked like running away with it in the first half.

A lot of balls rolled through to the goalie but other than the goal not a lot. Was Villa's scuffed shot in the first half?
 
Back
Top Bottom