Oh I see, now we are down to semantics. I gave a statement where I asked you to list your sources, then later asked a direct question.
Why is it bizarre exactly? You claimed Grim's sources weren't factual, blanket claimed twitter was basically worthless (yes, paraphrasing) and I'm the one that's saying bizarre stuff?
I'm not struggling at all, I just don't think you should be painting the entire wall as white here, when it isn't correct. Grim does post truthful/factual stuff around 50% of the time. 25% is parody(or sometimes a troll). The remainder is unchecked/unverified, or blatant BS.
So if you think my comprehension is lacking, I'm heavily suggesting here that you look at yourself and realize you were wrong. Even if it is annoying that he posts 50% non-trustworthy stuff.