Just a cut and paste, sorry:
"Article 42.7 obliges EU countries to aid a fellow member state that becomes “the victim of armed aggression on its territory” by “all the means in their power”. This formulation is reminiscent of the better-known Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which calls on NATO member states to assist a party being attacked “by taking forthwith … such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force”."
Unfortunately, it's a tried and tested plan that's been proven to work.Sounds a bit Hitler youth to me
Probably air support to enforce a no fly zone.So if Ukraine was in the EU what would the EU be doing differently right now?
So if Ukraine was in the EU what would the EU be doing differently right now?
I'm no expert on sanctions but its ridiculous to suggest that the UK government is not being tough on Russia.
They won’t. Russia will just say stay out or nukes will come. EU are not NATO.Just a cut and paste, sorry:
"Article 42.7 obliges EU countries to aid a fellow member state that becomes “the victim of armed aggression on its territory” by “all the means in their power”. This formulation is reminiscent of the better-known Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which calls on NATO member states to assist a party being attacked “by taking forthwith … such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force”."
...and if we had your preferred Momentum controlled Corbyn government they'd probably be sanctioning Ukraine and sending weapons to Russia..
I'll just excuse A because of B, which didn't even happen
Good we don't need the US having a monopoly on power. Checks and balances are needed.The US isn't in the EU. So of course Russia would be less worried by an EU army. But, in my opinion, the EU will get closer integration over the coming decades and could well be a superpower in the future.
I disagree. Russia's actions in Ukraine will directly impact the EU's future. It is far more likely that militay spending of EU nations will increase significantly. Germany has already said it will increase spending. I also think it will speed up the closer integration of national armies into an EU army. It is also going to resullt in an expansion of the EU. Putin has triggered exactly what he wanted to prevent.This is all a distraction, an EU army and the ramifications of Brexit have nothing to do with the murderous Russian leadership invading Ukraine and destroying it's cities.
Maybe you could offer your opinion and insight rather than continually spamming any anti-west, contrary opinion pieces you can find.
They won’t. Russia will just say stay out or nukes will come. EU are not NATO.
No donations at all let them have a set budget paid for by the taxpayer.Conservatives OUT. They are a security risk.
Perhaps a law against political party donations from people or institutions with people that have not been UK citizens for 30 years?
That is not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that the sanctions do not appear to be AS tough as the government is making out, what with the grace periods they appear to be giving to Russian banks, and refusing to go after certain individuals. What they are doing may even be the right call under the circumstances - but they don't appear to be being transparent about it.
I disagree. Russia's actions in Ukraine will directly impact the EU's future. It is far more likely that military spending of EU nations will increase significantly. Germany has already said it will increase spending. I also think it will speed up the closer integration of national armies into an EU army. It is also going to result in an expansion of the EU. Putin has triggered exactly what he wanted to prevent.
No donations at all let them have a set budget paid for by the taxpayer.
Expect heavy delays.
There are dozens of issues. Will France's Nuclear weapons be EU weapons, non proliferation would say no. Some countries may want larger armies relative to population, as you say due to risk. Will countries like other countries brigades to sit on their soil. Will voting on military action be the EU parliament, or one country, one vote etc., etc.What is interesting is that as a likely result the EU will have to adapt it's stance - the buffer countries will demand more say at the table due to the risk. I think there will be some adjustments with respect to equality.