don't think so.
iirc there was one study that found certain areas of gay men's brains resemble female brains more than males.
But they don't have lower serotonin they'd be much more ****ed (ok bad pun
) if that was the case.Usage of the word "gay"
- Thread starter DBT85
- Start date
don't think so.
iirc there was one study that found certain areas of gay men's brains resemble female brains more than males.
But they don't have lower serotonin they'd be much more ****ed (ok bad pun
) if that was the case.The operative words being " the missus" and not "another man".
Holding hands with missus while taking a stroll in the park = Straight.
Holding hands with another man talking a stroll in the park = Gay
Even if the other guy is special needs on a day trip and you are his helper, you love him, and want to touch his bottom.
The difference is that trying to get your Mrs to let you kick her back doors in is a challenge and therefore a manly task to take on.
With a Gayer it's easy, they expect you to bum them silly.
The difference is that trying to get your Mrs to let you kick her back doors in is a challenge and therefore a manly task to take on.
With a Gayer it's easy, they expect you to bum them silly.
I almost spat my tea out all over the keyboard!
Caporegime
And that's the best bit! You don't have to beg, plead, promise to do the washing up for a week or feed him Anadin! You just get on with it. You poor devils.
Soldato
can of gay
And that's the best bit! You don't have to beg, plead, promise to do the washing up for a week or feed him Anadin! You just get on with it. You poor devils.
I don't promise any of that, I offer her a wooden spoon to bite on and that's it.
No, according to when I studied biology, the latest research showed that hormone imbalances during fetal development may be the cause.
Also, the more male children a woman has, the higher the likelihood becomes of later male offspring being gay, which is believed to happen due to the mothers body trying to feminise the embryo somehow.
All embryos, whether XX or XY begin development as female, then in the case of XY, due to the action of the sex determining region of the Y chromosome, one particular androgen inhibits female development, and another stimulates male development (I cant recall the name of one of the androgens, and the other is Dihydrotestosterone, but I cant remember which role it plays).
It is believed that in imbalance of such hormones may lead to a highly variable alteration of either a persons sexuality, or even their mental gender, regardless of whichever phenotype is expressed in their genitalia (Also, natural XX males and XY females plus anything inbetween can naturally occur, but is far far rarer than sexuality and mental gender variations).
In any case, no area or association within medical science any longer considers sexuality to be a disorder. Science describes it as a variation, but the exact causes are not known, and any evidence trying to pinpoint the cause on genes has always turned out to be completely inconclusive.
Last edited:
only the fat ones
Depending on the age of the students and the context he could get some interesting replies there... "I was implying that it was rubbish, in the same way that getting buggered seems like bad idea?"
Wonder how well the teacher really thinks it through.
I'm not saying it's a bad idea stopping kids from using it in that way, however it could lead to some interesting conversations if the teachers don't really want to talk about it.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Will Betty Crocker do?
Soldato
Words are mean nothing without the context they are used in.