Was there seriously no hope?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
5,415
I posted a thread about what I reasoned may be an interesting topic, about people's vices and how they deal with them. It quickly dissolved into a for & against drugs rant which lasted barely 30 posts, and just when I was attempting to get the thread back on the original intention, it got locked with no explanation. I've mentioned already that I'm not normally one to argue against a don's decisions, but was it really necessary to shut down a thread that had potential once people stuck to the point? Considering other threads have rampaged far beyond any validity, why the hell was my thread shut down without any kind of chance to even stick to the topic?

Note that I would have inquired about this issue personally, but whoever closed the thread didn't even bother to leave a comment, let alone a reason as to why the thread was closed.
 
They were completely right to shut it down. It would have gone in circles and been nothing more than pseudo-intellectual willy waving going round and round in circles with strawmen and running tangents of no relevance to the original topic for thirty pages. It would be like a thread in motors when someone says they bought something the BMW gang don't like.
 
i thought it was a good thread, i didn't understand this quote though

**I still play with fire because it's so pretty, especially when it dances.

what is 'it'?

and i just lol'ed at skyfalls sig
 
:D BMW Gang in Motors? From what i've read they don't often recommend that make in spec me theads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom