As I told you earlier, it wasn't about the priest.
Well I'm glad to see that they've included instructions for the future!
- Thread starter dirtychinchilla
- Start date
And if it was about the quality of Daily Mail articles then as I said, there are better examples....
Yes I was describing the content so that I wasn't accused of dropping an article and running. I didn't mention what was on the USB pen.
Yet you linked the article and made the point that the article involved a Priest....going so far as to imply that the article is complicit in allowing said preists to avoid being 'caught' in future, thereby implying guilt, which you reinforce with subsequent replies.......
The truth is that you posted the article because of the involvement of the Preist and the accusations, not because it was a instruction manual for switching off Autoplay on a USB stick.
Indeed, with the intention of warning other priests.
To be honest I reckon he did it, it's not really worth denying.
To be honest I reckon he did it, it's not really worth denying.
So he is guilty simply because he is a catholic preist and based on your irrational prejudice.....
So you did post the article simply to create outrage against religion, even though there is no evidence and against any presumption of innocence that anyone not involved in the Catholic Church would be entitled to.
Then why deny it?
Last edited:
Devil's advocate. No I think he's guilty because he owns a usb pen with gay porn on it in the same was as if I had a usb pen with gay porn on it I'd assume that it was my porn and not someone else's. I shall repent if it's found not to be the case.
Yet the USB stick was not his personal property.....and any number of people could have access to it.
You are not being a devils advocate, you are trying to project your assumptions as facts.
Well it says it had been used by various members of the church, so it could also belong to one of them, presumably.
Which implies that the individual should be given the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.
Associate
You would be surprised what people have on USB sticks, at work we were really understaffed, and I was dealing with angry customers on the photo processing section. I had to help a woman make a 'bag for life' with a picture of her cat on it. The 16 images loaded on the machine, 15 were of her female parts and one of her cat.
So I enjoyed telling my friends how I put her 'Other word for cat and female part' on a bag for life for her
So I enjoyed telling my friends how I put her 'Other word for cat and female part' on a bag for life for her
Fair enough, it could still, very well, be a catholic priest then.
Or any number of other people who are not Catholic Priests......any number of the laity could have access to the stick, including an alterboy who thinks it would be highly amusing to put gay porn on the Parish Priests USB.....
Soldato
Haha what a twisted faggy peado!
Let's hope that's the case then.
So anyone who is Gay is a 'twisted faggy paedo'?
Soldato
No, but showing small children pictures of men sucking each other off does.
It was a Parents meeting, the single child present wasn't there because he was invited......
Besides the Priest didn't show anyone anything, he maintains the images were not his, the USB was on autoplay, He removed the USB immediately the images appeared and the Police say no crime was committed......
And do you know what 'faggy' actually implies?