It gets you murdered because it’s mostly marketing BS. You even said it yourself earlier, you should not buy a GPU on potential.
RT, DLSS Gsync, physx etc. the truth is that as it sits right now, either an Nvidia or AMD GPU will give a largely similar experience for the majority of gaming needs and the “features” are largely marketing fluff.
Absolutely correct.
This part of the forum has always been partially, about the hardware engineering side of things. I think that the conflict in opinions here stems from the fact that older gaming engines and DX12 in general don't really like the 7900XT, no matter what the hardware is specified at and that is skewing the benchmark of benchmark summary basket of games used by the bigger sites.
The 7900XT might be engineered to be 20% faster than the 4070ti at the hardware level but if it can't deploy that performance into software, outside of a few edge cases (Timespy, WH3 4k) and newer gaming engines (COD, A Plague Tale: Requiem) then there's there's lots of work to be done by AMD on the 2023 catalogue of games to show what the card can do, probably starting with Starfield which will be one of the biggest games in H1 2023.
The problem with Starfield is, the engine is a dog and its a mystery how the 4070ti vs 7900XT comparison will play out on this game.