What film did you watch last night?

Jack Reacher
7/10

I wasn't expecting much from this, but was pleasantly surprised.
In a nutshell Cruise plays the character of a (private) investigator who has the ability to notice very subtle clues. Almost like a CSI (without the need to perform a forensic examination). BUT, as he is not employed by the Government, he investigates without being bound by the rules of a Government investigator.
 
Jack Reacher
7/10

I wasn't expecting much from this, but was pleasantly surprised.
In a nutshell Cruise plays the character of a (private) investigator who has the ability to notice very subtle clues. Almost like a CSI (without the need to perform a forensic examination). BUT, as he is not employed by the Government, he investigates without being bound by the rules of a Government investigator.

I want to watch this, but it's going to be so hard for me now to find it rubbish. It does look like a resonably good film, it's just not jack reacher, it's so far from the books.
 
Oblivion (cinema) - 9/10

Best Sci Fi I've seen in years. Totally awesome.

Last Sci Fi I saw was Prometheus, which was pants. So I'm not just an avid Sci Fi nut.

P.S. Tom Cruise is 50 now, he still looks younger than me and he's 17 years older! Plus he's still buff. How the hell does he do it? :p
 
The Thing (1982)

Still a great horror film, very tense and the two hours just seem to fly by. Also my mind was blown when I read this theory about the ending. See below... :o

When you guys were talking about the ambiguous resolution to The Thing, it reminded me of a film analysis I read of the Thing in college, namely that the bottle of alcohol that Kurt Russell and Kieth David share at the end of the film is actually one of the bottles of ether or fuel that Kurt Russell was using for molotov cocktails. Kurt Russell never actually takes a drink of it, but Kieth David does. A human would know the difference between drinking a bottle of ether or gasoline immediately, but the creature has no reference for it, or a gag reflex that an actual human would have when drinking it. It drinks the bottle, imitating a human, not knowing that it was a trick on Macready's part to prove whether David's character had been taken by the creature or not."

Notice Kurt Russell's reaction to him drinking as the music hits.

I've seen that film loads of times. It's one of my all time favourites :)

That said, I think you might be reading something into the ending that isn't there. I'm pretty sure that the ending is supposed to be totally ambiguous.

The central theme of the movie is not knowing who you can trust. As it stands, we still don't know who we can trust at the end. It's a very good way to end the film.
 
Back
Top Bottom