What is the most Graphicaly demanding game out there ?

Wynthorpe · 10 Jan 2011 at 19:26

rippling said:
Arma2 on full with 10km draw distance will bring every pc to its knees eventually with all the real time ai going on !

THIS! Kills my rig and im running i7950 @4.2 and 2 GTX470's.

PaddyMC89 · 10 Jan 2011 at 20:52

Crysis is still the prettiest, but Arma 2 is probably the most demanding.

arknor · 10 Jan 2011 at 20:54

davewhite04 said:
Graphically demanding does not necassarily mean the best graphics btw. Give GTA IV a go on full settings.

looks like crap unless you have an ati card that can force aa

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:00

davewhite04 said:
Graphically demanding does not necassarily mean the best graphics btw. Give GTA IV a go on full settings.

will do

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:00

arknor said:
looks like crap unless you have an ati card that can force aa

I have a ATI HD 5770

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:01

rippling said:
Arma2 on full with 10km draw distance will bring every pc to its knees eventually with all the real time ai going on !

hahah , would you say this is the most demanding ?

Overslop · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:31

rippling said:
Arma2 on full with 10km draw distance will bring every pc to its knees eventually with all the real time ai going on !

Yep, even the first ArmA is pretty unplayable maxed out with any PC.

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:32

Overslop said:
Yep, even the first ArmA is pretty unplayable maxed out with any PC.

is Arma 2 a bit like flash point Dragon rising ( i mean game play wize)

Overslop · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:35

Yep. Bare in mind that although the first ArmA is a hog to run it doesn't look all that great. The sequel does however.

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:38

well , i definatly have a nice list of games 2 buy now

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:39

Overslop said:
Yep. Bare in mind that although the first ArmA is a hog to run it doesn't look all that great. The sequel does however.

ok , ill avoid arma the 1st 1

Curunen · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:40

Modded oblivion with things such as RAEVWD or MTAEVWD, texture packs, better cities and so on.

Mahnsikir · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:41

Overslop said:
Yep, even the first ArmA is pretty unplayable maxed out with any PC.

Actually for some reason I installed ARMA 1 (1.15beta patch) again today and it ran pretty damn well on almost max settings (a few I set to high instead of v high for no good reason what so ever).

This was only on a Q6600 @ 3Ghz, stock 4870 512mb & 4gig ram, I'm sure I've ran it on this computer before as I was expecting it to run like a bit of a hog but it surprised me. This was only on a few single missions plus flying about with 10k views so may run a lot worse in a bigger mission.

kola · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:43

Supreme Commander 2

wellaman5000 · 10 Jan 2011 at 22:53

kola said:
Supreme Commander 2

never herd of that , is the gameplay good ?

Amnesia · 10 Jan 2011 at 23:01

Ch3m1c4L · 10 Jan 2011 at 23:02

supreme commander 2 doesnt even strain a system that much, supreme commander one was more demanding on overalll power

While 1 is a fun huge scale RTS, 2 went over to a simplified game and it sucks for it.

Amnesia · 10 Jan 2011 at 23:03

TheCenturion said:
I've found Crysis to be more demanding on my system than Metro 2033, and the graphics on crysis beat any other game that has been made in my opinion

did you try metro2033 in DX11 ? it made my 570gtx cry.

Ch3m1c4L · 10 Jan 2011 at 23:36

Amnesia said:
did you try metro2033 in DX11 ? it made my 570gtx cry.

crysis runs fine on my rig, metro doesnt run all maxed dx10 very well, runs smooth as butter with physx off and in high though

Paul_cz · 10 Jan 2011 at 23:50

Arma 2 and Metro 2033 are two most demanding games on the market IMO.

And also two absolutely best looking.