Thats my understanding too, it doesn't really matter what reason it is taken for it is the total that counts and we always come out somewhere near the middle.
The Scandanavian countries are generally near the top but then they have incredible standards of public service and education systems that make ours look plain retarded.
The US is always much lower than us but then they have a much much smaller set of public services ie no healthcare!
Oh an off topic who ever it was that said the US have better TV than us have you ever actually been and watched it? The don't have endless wall to wall Lost or Band of Brothers standard programs they have more than enough crap clogging the airwaves!
The problem is, things get cheaper per person as population goes up.
IE it costs more to setup a healthcare system that provides complete service for 500k people than for 50million, because you buy supplies in higher bulk, you build bigger more economical hospitals, doctors should be less wasted, IE you might need only one specialist for 2-3 surgerys which amongst 500k people is 5 surgerys a year but amongst 50mil 1 doctor is busy all year long.
Thats the problem with the UK, it SHOULD be cheaper, a LOT cheaper than scandanavian countries with small populations, its not significantly.
We are also stealth taxed up the backside, generally these comparisons are about the basic taxes and don't tend to include things like massive money generating speed camera/parking fines systems which we've set up.
America isn't doing bad and I get REALLY fed up with people saying the USA has no healthcare, it spends BILLIONS and billions a year on free health care, but as with our system, they can't afford to(with their current miltary spending) to cover every person in the system, they spend billions upon billions on free healthcare though and its so massively inaccurate to suggest they don't.
Private healthcare is essentially a "stealth tax" in the states though, and frankly is very good, but as with anything you don't "have" to pay for, too many people take the risk, assume they'll be fine and don't get great medical insurance, either none or get the cheapest crappest screws you out of every treatment insurance and screw themselves in the process.
Meh, we're taxed very highly here for ever worsening services, but out biggest scam/rip off is benefits where we are being bled dry, and the amount of wastes money we pay in wages to public sector workers we don't need is criminal(thanks Labour).
The other simple problem with comparing taxes, is it doesn't compare debt, or tax we NEED to be paying for the country to be, coming at least close to breaking even.
IE the tax level the UK(and Ireland, Spain, Italy, forget the other big one, Greece is it?) SHOULD be paying to cover the massive spending we've all racked up and to slow down debt growth is stupidly higher than what we are actually spending.
IE Norway has 25% vat or something, and 35% tax on average where we average 25%(making up the numbers), however their debt is going up slightly, in safeish levels with no real problems and great services.
THe UK however has ever increasing debt, unsafe levels of debt, worsening services and needs to be paying 40% tax on average to get back to the same safe levels of deficit places like Norway are running.
This is the big problem, ACTUAL taxation isn't really the problem, its what we SHOULD be paying to cover what our government is ACTUALLY spending, is much higher than most other countries in the EU, at some point cuts to spending just won't fix our deficit problems, Labour has lost too many real jobs and saddled us with millions of public servants we don't need who serve no purpose, but won't have other jobs to go into if they all get fired(which with unions and current setup of public services, would be near impossible anyway). When we cut what can be cut without laying off a couple million people, tax will need to go up to cover the shortfall, at which point Labour will get re-elected, crank up spending, drop taxes and plunge us into debt we can never break free of.