I'm not saying this is the case for you, but for many people, watches are something to be worn to show something to others.
Definitely true for some brand orientated folks.
I'm not saying this is the case for you, but for many people, watches are something to be worn to show something to others.
I got mine on ebay. I may have had a few beers and may have paid through the nose a bitLove it, where/how did you get that?
I regret having flogged my Speedy Pro. It was such a strap guzzler too - it looked good on absolutely everything I tried it on.I wear my Speedmaster for several reasons: [1] It really is a utility watch, [2] I was born during the moon walk and it is known as the moon watch due to being worn by some Apollo astronauts, [3] Because of its connection to the moon waalk it symbolises what each of us can achieve if we strive to overcome difficulties, [4] What is engraved on the back of mine are the words I texted to my friends and family when each of my children were born (it's a special edition for the moon walk rather than the usual moon landing). It's my watch and apart from my fathers watch (which is nothing special but has sentimental value) I can't see me wearing another. Even if I were to become a multi-millionaire I would still wear this watch.
Nothing is wrong with hardlex, I've never managed to scratch a crystal and mineral glass is more shatter resistant. The 'new' 5 is just an update of the old bezel-less models they've had on their catalogue for years.
Yes it's an incredibly versatile watch. I have many straps for it.I regret having flogged my Speedy Pro. It was such a strap guzzler too - it looked good on absolutely everything I tried it on.
Personal preference for the distortion of non sapphire, the ability to easily repair any scratches (though they are thus easier to acquire!) and I can't stand AR coatings on the outside of crystals as they mark so ludicrously easily.Nothing wrong with it but for the price sapphire with AR is not unreasonable to expect given these are every day watches and since smaller brands can do it so why can't Seiko. The glimmer from AR also looks great which personally I value.
Nothing wrong with it but for the price sapphire with AR is not unreasonable to expect given these are every day watches and since smaller brands can do it so why can't Seiko. The glimmer from AR also looks great which personally I value.
Personal preference for the distortion of non sapphire, the ability to easily repair any scratches (though they are thus easier to acquire!) and I can't stand AR coatings on the outside of crystals as they mark so ludicrously easily.
I'm very tempted to find a distortiony crystal for my Submariner, nice blend of retro with the otherwise very standard 5 digit look.
Can AR coatings only be applied to sapphire or can it go on any other crystal?
Can AR coatings only be applied to sapphire or can it go on any other crystal?
Same, as much as I like the look of the B&R (and the br05 for that matter), I wouldn't pay that price for it... I feel it's about £500-1000 too much.The B&R is very nice but not £2200 nice IMO!!
Same, as much as I like the look of the B&R (and the br05 for that matter), I wouldn't pay that price for it... I feel it's about £500-1000 too much.
That 'delay' between purchase and delivery puts me off too, actually had a look round echoneutra and they had the chronograph that was 'almost' what I was looking for (want a 2 dial chrono at some point) but they had to ruin it with the delay and that stupid red badge at 6 o'clock....
How do you come across these microbrands @mrk ?