Associate
space will only be inviting when we need to mine
It's hardly rocket science (pun mildly intentional). Space exploration will probably reap no tangible benefits for mankind for generations yet... other than some technology advances we haven't found any mineable resources or have the tech to extract them, and there is nowhere habitable within umpteen light years. What exactly is the "average person" going to get out of funding space exploration, and why should the "average person" who has trouble enough making ends meet on Earth care? Advances in space exploration on the scale you are talking about (grand betterment of mankind) will likely only be possible when the world isn't a fractured set of governments that can pool resources together, and when the many problems affecting the many populaces are no longer such a huge concern.
Seems like you haven't actually thought much through logically beyond: "OMG COOL SPACE EXPLORATION LOL".![]()

Think of all the jobs created in making the Olympic stadium not to mention the boost to the economy with foreign visitors buying things coming to the olympics.2012 Olympics 10Bn, send a rover to mars - 6.1 Bn. I know what id rather spend the money on and it isnt a load of people running around a track in lycra !
The needs of the many are served by decreasing the strain on Earth. The medium to long term goal should be colonization of the nearby planets, i.e. the Moon, Mars, and perhaps the Galilean moons (obviously not IO though!). These can all provide water and other resources to maintain independence. A lower population on Earth solves the starvation issue, probably helps reduce the wars and also with people off world the human race survives if homeworld is destroyed.
Of course with the narrow, blinkered thinking of "Don't spend money on space when people are starving" is exactly that. Narrow-minded thinking. And we cannot do any of what I listed above with heavily investing in space. It would be clumsy steps at first but at least it would be progress. Instead we spend trillions on killing people. That's not looking after the many, is it?
Also, some diseases such as cancer can only really be studied properly in space (the cells don't grow correctly in a dish) plus a lot of research can be done into bone wasting conditions and radiation related illness. A lot of technology we use everyday has its roots in the space industry.
You are right to question the amount of time, effort and resources we as a race put into military applications and killing each other, however that doesn't automatically make it a viable proposition that retasking that commitment into Space Research is a better use of that commitment than using it in other areas of a more terrestrial consideration such as renewable clean energy and so on.
Pragmatism and Realism.
I agree with the fact that travel speed is an issue.
However to echo what others have said, if we spent less on wars and criminal profiteering then we could actually allocate a larger sum to developing faster space flight.
To think we are just one tiny atom in comparison to the size of the universe absolutely fascinates me, and should do the majority of the human race. Our entire existence as a species and a planet is just a tiny cog among trillions and trillions of others in space.
Its nuts to even contemplate.
I agree with what you are saying, space/exploration and bettering ourselves as a race is fascinating to me as well, I'm quite a deep thinker because of what I have been through in my life, many people these days live sugar coated lives and haven't really been through adversity, experienced a lot if you get what I'm saying. People are selfish and just don't look at the bigger picture man, they just don't care, they really don't.
Military times have brought around some of the greatest inventions and technological advances of our history, both past and modern, and many are applicable to peace-time too, so I don't think it should be so quickly discounted as being a viable route towards improved space technology and technology in general.
[...]and the argument that a lot of tech we use today comes from Space research is a little weak, as far more tech we use today and more besides comes from military applications and the art of killing each other[...]