Soldato
So the first hybrid cars available were 'self-charging hybrids' and they are self-charging because the batteries are relatively small and the electric engines are relatively weak. This means they can only go a very short distance on electric only and usually under 30mph.
A step up from these are plug-in hybrids, with much larger batteries and much more powerful electric motors. These cars can typically go 20-35 miles on the battery alone.
So why, all of a sudden, is Toyota and Lexus advertising 'self-charging hybrids - no need to plug in' as a thing when a plug-in hybrid is better than a non plug-in? Is it just because many people believe hybrids have to be plugged in to charge? The message in the advert seems to be backwards as if it were suggesting self-charging hybrids are better than plug-in hybrids even though the opposite is true.
A step up from these are plug-in hybrids, with much larger batteries and much more powerful electric motors. These cars can typically go 20-35 miles on the battery alone.
So why, all of a sudden, is Toyota and Lexus advertising 'self-charging hybrids - no need to plug in' as a thing when a plug-in hybrid is better than a non plug-in? Is it just because many people believe hybrids have to be plugged in to charge? The message in the advert seems to be backwards as if it were suggesting self-charging hybrids are better than plug-in hybrids even though the opposite is true.