Caporegime
Not as nice as my Vega 64 LC
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Not as nice as my Vega 64 LC
Yes, the approved ones (currently a short list) get it enabled by default. For the non-approved ones you have to enable it manually. To be Nvidia approved, monitors have to support a min-max refresh range of 2.4X. So all FreeSync monitors with a narrow refresh range are automatically classed as non-approved. AMD now requires a similar 2.5X range for FreeSync 2 monitors.I seen somewhere that the approved models automatically enabled it, the unapproved ones either had issues with flickering, strobing or didn't enable it automatically?
Except it doesn't and you keep playing this tune. People showed you multiple times that it was the API causing the performance but you chose to ignore it.
Nope. It is basically around the same performance as what I already have plus 4GB extra RAM which will never be used. If it was £500 then it would have made headlines and everyone would have been singing its praises, but it is just too expensive.
No i am happy enough with my Vega 64 and tbh i think it's priced to high.
Yes, the approved ones (currently a short list) get it enabled by default. For the non-approved ones you have to enable it manually. To be Nvidia approved, monitors have to support a min-max refresh range of 2.4X. So all FreeSync monitors with a narrow refresh range are automatically classed as non-approved. AMD now requires a similar 2.5X range for FreeSync 2 monitors.
This is the silliest thing about the memory on the Radeon VII, the bandwidth.
Below is a pic of the memory bandwidth on the RTX Titan overclocked very high and it is nowhere near the figure claimed for the new AMD card, are they really saying it needs that much compared to a much faster NVidia card.
There was a time when AMD delivered exactly what gamers needed.
This is the silliest thing about the memory on the Radeon VII, the bandwidth.
Below is a pic of the memory bandwidth on the RTX Titan overclocked very high and it is nowhere near the figure claimed for the new AMD card, are they really saying it needs that much compared to a much faster NVidia card.
There was a time when AMD delivered exactly what gamers needed.
Was about to reply to him, but it seems you did it for me. Basically this.No, AMD never intended to give a consumer gaming card that much bandwidth. It all comes back to the fact that it is a salvaged part from failed Instinct Mi60 GPUs. Once the 4 stacks of HBM2 are mounted to the interpose you can't remove them. Therefore you get 16GB VRM with 1TB/S bandwidth, of the whole lot goes in the bin.
If AMD wanted to have a dedicated gaming part they would have stuck to 2 stacks of HBM for 8GB and 512GB/s
It might end up only being £50 more than what you paid for your 1080 Ti in the end easy, if it performs the same then it will be funny as you are calling this silly, but you went on about your £600 purchase of a 1080 Ti like it was the best deal ever. Lol.AMD trying to be relevant in the gfx arena
Rad 7 is a silly card with silly memory for silly money
Radeon VII beats Titan V in the price.