Maybe so but with answers like that I think RDM should consider becoming a member of parliament.
To be honest considering how any straight yes or no answer would be used I am starting to have some sympathy as to why politicians avoid giving them.
Maybe so but with answers like that I think RDM should consider becoming a member of parliament.
To be honest considering how any straight yes or no answer would be used I am starting to have some sympathy as to why politicians avoid giving them.
To be honest considering how any straight yes or no answer would be used I am starting to have some sympathy as to why politicians avoid giving them.
Yes, I certainly see that myself. I find it quite shocking how some people will try and trap you with such questions and then lampoon you for being evasive!
I don't even know that the question was relevant to the discussion so I ignored it, in any case I'm not really in a position to comment on your choice of sexual partner.
As for the rest I was showing that much of the arguments for and against the relative animals welfare and so on are either subjective or lacking in conclusive evidence and my belief that local communities should decide such matters in their own communities, whether that is for or against hunting in any form is immaterial to me as I do not have strong feelings either way.
RDM should be arrested.
Nice try.
Do you apply the same principles to bestiality? Both hunting and bestiality relate to animal welfare so the relevence is pretty obvious. It's certainly just as relevant as animals suffering and dying for food. Of course, I knew you wouldn't be able to answer it without either undermining your position or condoning bestiality. Nice try.
And I think RDM already mentioned that sexual relations in law are generally based on consent, whereas the killing of Animals either legally or illegally is not. So I don't think the
comparison is particularly relevant or even comparable in any practical sense.
What about from a moral standpoint rather than legal? I think we can agree that killing animals for sport, killing animals for food and exploiting animals for sexual pleasure are bad for animal welfare to at least some degree, and clearly the animal can't consent to any of it. However, I still think there's a signifcant difference between killing animals for food, and using them for bloodsport or bestiality. Do you?
I found it surprising that bestiality is legal in Germany and a few other European countries, strange how many people don't see anything wrong with that either.
I found it surprising that bestiality is legal in Germany