World Trade Center Dust Contains Evidence of Explosives

SexyGreyFox

SexyGreyFox

SexyGreyFox

Man of Honour
Joined
29 Mar 2003
Posts
57,161
Location
Stoke on Trent
Thought some might find this interesting -

A group of scientists have published their results into a peer reviewed journal, Open Chemical Physics Journal, stating that within the debris of the WTC, they have found evidence of a "highly engineered explosive".

The papers abstract read, “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center.”

Their analysis claims to show "active thermitic material" known as "nanostructured super-thermite." Thermite is used in demolition, hand grenades, welding and fireworks. It known for creating a chemical reaction that creates very high temperatures.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
 
I swear if I read another one of these ******* idiots spouting their rubbish, I'll setup my own terrorist organisation to take them out.

They're worse than the creationists or the "we didn't goto the moon" brigade.

To the OP, hang your head in shame for even posting this.
 
It's a load of rubbish.

The study, however, shows that the dust was collected from four different sites, three of which were not in the immediate area surrounding the fallen towers. Most of the samples are collections of dust taken from blocks away.
Click to expand...

As well as they are retards, was it explosives or thermite, the two are not the same. Thermite could not bring the towers down.
 
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Im going to play devils advocate here, but for a change at least this has been posted for peer review in a scientific manor. Here is the journal for you to do so yourself, which is the point of it. For things to be respected and acknowledged as correct they are put to an open audience for review, this means they can be scrutinised. This isn't just some mental ramblings.

There are people involved from these universities.
1Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
49/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
 
The was a programme on BBC2 about this quite a while back. They said it would have been near impossible to have done it without something being noticed.

They then claimed it was all done when the towers were being built. :rolleyes:
 
Cookie-Monster said:
I really like the concept of a scientific manor.....
Click to expand...

I really don't understand why people aren't taking this a little bit more seriously than a video on youtube. (unless you know this is a joke paper or the study is farcical?)
Its been put forward with consise research and referencing, along with what i as a mere mortal of the non science world would consider a highly detailed scanning process.
Read the conclusion, its fairly damning.
Thermite is used in construction, i.e welding, but anaylsis has shown this material is spread in fair quantity, and spread very far. It is also shown to be finer grain than standard thermite, which requires a very special mixing process most commonly seen in nano thermite for weapons.
 
ChroniC said:
I really don't understand why people aren't taking this a little bit more seriously than a video on youtube. (unless you know this is a joke paper or the study is farcical?)
Its been put forward with consise research and referencing, along with what i as a mere mortal of the non science world would consider a highly detailed scanning process.
Read the conclusion, its fairly damning.
Thermite is used in construction, i.e welding, but anaylsis has shown this material is spread in fair quantity, and spread very far. It is also shown to be finer grain than standard thermite, which requires a very special mixing process most commonly seen in nano thermite for weapons.
Click to expand...

as the samples where not taken from the WTC and most of them weren't taken straight after, add to that the fact that no thermite was noticed and that thermite can't be used to bring a building like that down and it shows how stupid this paper is. I'm sure they did find some stuff in the samples, but that doesn't have any relation to the wtc destruction. Oh and ontop of that 4 samples, sorry that is not a proper study 4 hole samples wow..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom