• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Worth upgrading i7 5820K to i7 5960X?

Associate
Joined
20 Nov 2009
Posts
2,050
Location
Haarby, DENMARK
I own an Intel Core i7 5820K 6 core cpu, and now coffee lake has been released I am feeling the upgrade itch and the i7 8700K seemed really tempting :)
However I have gotten an offer for an Intel Core i7 5960X 8 core cpu for £300, which I find real tempting since I don't need to change platform (reinstall windows + programs). Would it be worthwhile the upgrade? Have any of you done the same upgrade path?
I can probably get £150~180 for my current cpu, making it an £120~150 upgrade.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
No. 5960X even if overclocked at 4.5Ghz, is in par of a Ryzen 7. Which you can buy new for £260 (1700), £280 (1700X), and a good board for future upgrades. (Zen+ in Feb).
X99 and 5960X has only the 6950X which I doubt you will find £300 ever. By that time you could be able to buy better chips for the money, and having a worthless mobo.

So you either keep the current setup until Zen+ or 8core what ever Intel releases in 7 months (making 8700K+Z370 absolete). Or sell now it has some value.

And if you want to see where your CPU sits atm, check the 1600X @ 4Ghz benchmarks. If you OC the 5820K @ 4.4 is of similar perf.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
1,899
Location
Reading
I'd say go for it, a 5960x is a bargain at £300. My 5960x smashes games and day to day applications with ease. X99 is a fully mature and stable platform and has plenty of life left in it, plus you'll get at least £150 for the 5820k.

Just do it, unless you need an insane amount of cores everything is still a sidegrade to X99 right now.

P.S I went from a 5820k to a 6800k to the 5960x.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Nov 2009
Posts
2,050
Location
Haarby, DENMARK
I'd say go for it, a 5960x is a bargain at £300. My 5960x smashes games and day to day applications with ease. X99 is a fully mature and stable platform and has plenty of life left in it, plus you'll get at least £150 for the 5820k.

Just do it, unless you need an insane amount of cores everything is still a sidegrade to X99 right now.

P.S I went from a 5820k to a 6800k to the 5960x.[/

Sounds good! What made you go from 5820k to 6800k and then to 5960x? :)
Also do you run with the 5960x OCed? And if so what MHz, voltage, cooling :)


No. 5960X even if overclocked at 4.5Ghz, is in par of a Ryzen 7. Which you can buy new for £260 (1700), £280 (1700X), and a good board for future upgrades. (Zen+ in Feb).
X99 and 5960X has only the 6950X which I doubt you will find £300 ever. By that time you could be able to buy better chips for the money, and having a worthless mobo.

So you either keep the current setup until Zen+ or 8core what ever Intel releases in 7 months (making 8700K+Z370 absolete). Or sell now it has some value.

And if you want to see where your CPU sits atm, check the 1600X @ 4Ghz benchmarks. If you OC the 5820K @ 4.4 is of similar perf.

The reason why I am thinking of the core i7 5960x is due to its (supposed) longevity with 8 cores/16threads, and for the X99 platform I assume it would make it decent enough for approx 2 years time. Also a benefit would be i don't need to reinstall stuff and reactivate windows 10 (was a real hassle last I did that).

I have a small htpc/LAN rig with an AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8Ghz with stock cooler, and in productivity it is very capable and not far behind the 5820k, that's for sure. But for my main gaming rig I do prefer a little bit more umpf :)
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
Sounds good! What made you go from 5820k to 6800k and then to 5960x? :)
Also do you run with the 5960x OCed? And if so what MHz, voltage, cooling :)




The reason why I am thinking of the core i7 5960x is due to its (supposed) longevity with 8 cores/16threads, and for the X99 platform I assume it would make it decent enough for approx 2 years time. Also a benefit would be i don't need to reinstall stuff and reactivate windows 10 (was a real hassle last I did that).

I have a small htpc/LAN rig with an AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8Ghz with stock cooler, and in productivity it is very capable and not far behind the 5820k, that's for sure. But for my main gaming rig I do prefer a little bit more umpf :)

Hence I said Ryzen 7 not 5 :p
 
Soldato
Joined
28 May 2007
Posts
18,257
Assuming you can get the same clock speed I'd go for it. The only possible gotcha could be heat and power use but if your cooling and PSU are up to it £150 for a drop in upgrade isnt a bad deal.
 
Associate
Joined
10 Jul 2013
Posts
1,023
Location
Space
I had the chance to buy a 5960x and move on my 4770k I would have needed extra ram and a different board, just out of interest what did I miss out on?
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Nov 2009
Posts
2,050
Location
Haarby, DENMARK
Hence I said Ryzen 7 not 5 :p
Ah yea I missed that :)

Assuming you can get the same clock speed I'd go for it. The only possible gotcha could be heat and power use but if your cooling and PSU are up to it £150 for a drop in upgrade isnt a bad deal.

Yea I hope that it at least can do 4.1Ghz at a reasonable voltage and temperature on air with Phanteks ph-tc12dx, untill i get something better for cooling.
The PSU is 1500watt so it shouldn't have a problem with it.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
1,899
Location
Reading
Sounds good! What made you go from 5820k to 6800k and then to 5960x? :)
Also do you run with the 5960x OCed? And if so what MHz, voltage, cooling :)




The reason why I am thinking of the core i7 5960x is due to its (supposed) longevity with 8 cores/16threads, and for the X99 platform I assume it would make it decent enough for approx 2 years time. Also a benefit would be i don't need to reinstall stuff and reactivate windows 10 (was a real hassle last I did that).

I have a small htpc/LAN rig with an AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8Ghz with stock cooler, and in productivity it is very capable and not far behind the 5820k, that's for sure. But for my main gaming rig I do prefer a little bit more umpf :)

The 5960x (at the time) was a bargain buy and my previous chips were crappy overclockers so i thought what the hell.

I'm currently running my 5960x at 4.6 1.27v and ram at 3200 mhz. cooling wise i'm running a custom loop and the hottest i've ever seen a core is 72 degrees in Ibt, when gaming the cpu hovers in the mid 50's.

Like i said £300 is a steal for a 5960x. The only thing you'll regret is not buying it :)
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
10 Jul 2013
Posts
1,023
Location
Space
The 5960x (at the time) was a bargain buy and my previous chips were crappy overclockers so i thought what the hell.

I'm currently running my 5960x at 4.6 1.27v and ram at 3200 mhz. cooling wise i'm running a custom loop and the hottest i've ever seen a core is 72 degrees in Ibt, when gaming the cpu hovers in the mid 50's.

Like i said £300 is a steal for a 5960x. The only thing you'll regret is not buying it :)


Could you tell me how much of an improvement I’d of seen over my 4770k? I had the chance to get a 5960x and may still be able to
 
Soldato
Joined
28 May 2007
Posts
18,257
You'd have to price up the two systems. The AM4 rig only needs 2 sticks of memory so has a slight edge on price and has a little more longeverty.

The performance between the two will be very similar.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
You'd have to price up the two systems. The AM4 rig only needs 2 sticks of memory so has a slight edge on price and has a little more longeverty.

The performance between the two will be very similar.

True. Also if someone bothers to use the FlareX kit, can easily use BLCK OC to 150 on the CH6, to make it run at 3200C12. The CPU perf goes up by a hefty 7%, compared to the pre-configured DOP at 3200C14 at 100 BLCK

And before someone argues.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclocking-amd-ryzen,5011-8.html
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Posts
6,847
You'd have to price up the two systems. The AM4 rig only needs 2 sticks of memory so has a slight edge on price and has a little more longeverty.

The performance between the two will be very similar.
You don't have to use 4 sticks of RAM when your CPU has a quad channel memory controller.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Sep 2009
Posts
2,847
Location
Gloucestershire
I posted on another thread but 5820K CPUs are going for £220-230 with retail box. 6850K I was bidding on went for £277 which I considered a bargain so that's a good price. I ended up buying a 5820k for £195.0 to replace a Xeon 8 core which was clock limited to 2.5 GHz as I was going to use the system more for gaming.
 
Back
Top Bottom