Associate
Rush for every baby boy this week to be called the same as the latest royal. But would you choose it?
I don't understand the question and refuse to respond to it.Rush for every baby boy this week to be called the same as the latest royal. But would you choose it?
Debatable...No as despite shagging men I'm not gay enough to have a child called Louis.
We're have a baby in June and were praying they didn't choose the name we have in mind. We don't know the sex yet but only have one in mind for a boy. Safe to say it isn't Louis.
No as despite shagging men I'm not gay enough to have a child called Louis.
dl8861?
It's funny how they essentially live off the state and have 3 children and potential for more.
Yet the state has said no more benefits for 3rd or more children.
One rule for one and another rule for another. Royals essentially stole their power.
It's about time the state stopped funding them. How much is the upkeep of their estate too? it's ridiculous the amount of land they have that we essentially pay to maintain.
Never saw the point in middle names. Glad I don't have one.
isn't your middle name United?
Lol they are the first two annoying people I think of when I hear that name which makes me hate it. Seems an odd name for a royal imoMrs wanted to call him Louis. I immediately said no on the grounds of Louis Walsh is a ******* ****, and Louis Spence is THE gayest man on our planet
I imagine they bring in more money through tourism than they cost.
Americans are crazy about the royal family.