2. Lie. Why yes, It is kept in my garage. And yes, it is in the secure non public carpark at work!
3. Milege. Realisticly, sure he'll probably do the average of 10k miles a year. But, thats 10k miles of chances of a a crash. No Mr insurance company, I only do 2k miles a year.
4. Car Value. This massively puts the cost of the insurance up. But, even if you put half the value, you can still argue it should you need to make a claim.
I read somewhere on pistonheads that a 19 year old bought a volvo s60 t5 and his quote was only £1600
Imagine how much a normal s60 would cost.
The point is that it is done on statistics and not always size of the engine.
2. Wrong. Insuring in a garage is almost more expensive than a driveway, which is more expensive than the street.
3. People do get caught for this and get bent over.
4. Wrong. Often increasing the value of your car lowers the price.
So all together, terrible advice.
It's always been cheaper for me by a couple of hundred quid
Fully comp is usually cheaper.Also what's the point of insuring a 1k Fiesta fully comp, just go TPFT...

If a car is a total loss , most insurance companies will ask you for your V5 and MOT docs, this allows them to see what you Mileage was at every mot you done now, as they stored electronically.
Don't forget the 6 points.
On the Insurance policy, is the annual mileage on the policy for the car? Or is it for, what the policy holder does in the car? I say this as other's could also drive the car.

Unless your MOT starts at exactly the same time as your insurance, it's completely impossible for them to say exactly how many miles you've done during your insured period. It is nigh on impossible for them to prove, although I certainly don't recommend doing it.
Have a friend who has an old scrapper of a fiesta which has had the mileometer broken for years and has got the same mileage on MOT certs for the past 3ish years. The recording of mileage was at least up optional until recently, it may still be, I had 2 MOT certs sans mileage recordings for my old Minis.
Its how many miles in total the car will do per term, whether the policy holder or name driver does the mileage in the car is irrelevant for the question![]()
Are you sure about that?
It is perfectly possible (and legal) for someone else to have a separate insurance policy on the car for their use too, or for someone else to use it under DOC, or for it to be used on private land on trackdays etc. All of those three scenarios are adding mileage to the odometer on the car, but none of which are being covered by my main insurance policy...
Are you sure about that?
It is perfectly possible (and legal) for someone else to have a separate insurance policy on the car for their use too, or for someone else to use it under DOC, or for it to be used on private land on trackdays etc. All of those three scenarios are adding mileage to the odometer on the car, but none of which are being covered by my main insurance policy...
track days and other forms are racing are not covered by most insurance companies. DOC is covered by the other insurance policy, same as if you hit someone whilst using DOC, its the company providing the DOC that is liable.
the mileage you quote is for the policy holder and named drivers to use whilst using their policy legally. So in you head over to the 'ring, not cover by your policy so therefore not using up the mileage on your policy.
edit - im sure on it, otherwise how you suppose to give an estimated mileage, if you dont know whos going to be using DOC to drive your car, going to track days etc
Exactly as I thought, it's how many miles will be done that the insurance company will be insuring you for. Miles that the insurance company won't be covering you for (either because of another policy covering the use, or the use being on a private track, etc) do not need to be included. Consequently there could quite legitimately be a discrepancy between the annual increase in miles of the odometer recorded at MOT and the number of miles you're insurance policy is for.