Youtube clip of some random and police

[Draeger]

How come this has been made into a thread,i never made it a thread.....

Because you posted this nonsense within THIS thread despite it having absolutely no relevance other than the fact it mentions cops in it?.

If you want a video actually worth taking a few minutes to view about UK police officers and what they have to put up with, I suggest you have a gander at this :-

 

[Neo-Geo]

You have made a new thread.. did you mean to post it in another thread?

I posted it here but it was opened up as a new thread by a mod here for some reason.

My post was 57 but a few posts after this i posted the video link in this thread
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=21632868#post21632868

 

[batsy]

The hamsters are drunk!

 

[Neo-Geo]

Because you posted this nonsense within the other current cop thread despite it having absolutely no relevance other than the fact it mentions cops in it?.

If you want a video actually worth taking a few minutes to view about UK police officers and what they have to put up with, I suggest you have a gander at this :-

ERRR your wrong,get your facts right first and dont assume things.
Actually i did it in reply to post number 59 and 67.
I thought thats what you do here,converse by replying to people?Or is it cause i dont fit in here?Have i done something wrong by replying to these posters?

 

[steve-h]

When I can take a train to a major station without being stopped and searched via a rub down for something as ridiculous as cannabis possession, I'll respect them more overall, as I obviously favour most of what they do. But enforcing drug possession laws is something I cannot respect someone for doing I'm afraid.

 

[Draeger]

ERRR your wrong,get your facts right first and dont assume things.
Actually i did it in reply to post number 59 and 67.

No, I'm not wrong and I didn't assume anything. The video you linked to has no relevance to the thread you originally posted within, a thread discussing a serving police officers 9 year old child having her face spat in by a low life waste of space. I've no idea why the webstaff here decided to split the post off from there and start a new thread on your behalf but I'm willing to bet there was a valid reason for it somewhere along the lines of the above.

That said, if you can explain what the relevance is between the thread subject and your video link, I'm all ears.

 

[Werewolf]

The hamsters are drunk!

*hic*

 

[steve-h]

You're whining about them following the rules?

Petition politicians, instead.

Yes, the rules are dumb.

 

[Neo-Geo]

No, I'm not wrong and I didn't assume anything. The video you linked to has no relevance to the thread you originally posted within, a thread discussing a serving police officers 9 year old child having her face spat in by a low life waste of space. I've no idea why the webstaff here decided to split the post off from there and start a new thread on your behalf but I'm willing to bet there was a valid reason for it somewhere along the lines of the above.

That said, if you can explain what the relevance is between the thread subject and your video link, I'm all ears.

Can you explain why you seem to have a problem with my post with regards to replying to other posters as i just said to you in my previous post.

I thought that was how you converse on here?Arnt i allowed to answer in reply to other people?Or are you making a personal attack on me for nothing as far as i see,there are other posts in that thread that have nothing to do with the thread title but your not questioning those posters are you?
Why me?

Go pick on Werewolf who is talking about overweight cops or Von Hausen and other forum posters...no but you wont will you.

 

[steve-h]

So why hate the police?

Because they enforce it... keep up.

 

[steve-h]

So you'd prefer the police to enforce laws they personally approve of?

Yes, actually. Assuming they're not crazy and actually have questioned and discussed the laws they enforce. They are probably people in the best position to comment on the laws that they enforce.

Why blame the police? Why not blame the politicians and try and change their views?

Can I not dislike them both? Despite my new sig, I don't believe it'll make a bit of difference in changing a politician's mind.

 

[Threepwood]

Petition politicians, instead.

The ones who do not even listen to their own drug committee advisers?

Anyone remember the days the manchester police were complaining about the crack down on extacy? And they had to start dealing with loads of drunks again?

I think it is fine to have a whine about the police having to follow certain rules tbf.

 

[Draeger]

Can you explain why you seem to have a problem with my post with regards to replying to other posters as i just said to you in my previous post.

I thought that was how you converse on here?Arnt i allowed to answer in reply to other people?Or are you making a personal attack on me for nothing as far as i see,there are other posts in that thread that have nothing to do with the thread title but your not questioning those posters are you?
Why me?

Go pick on Werewolf who is talking about overweight cops or Von Hausen and other forum posters...no but you wont will you.

Wut?. What on earth are you on about?.

 

[Neo-Geo]

Wut?. What on earth are you on about?.

Read post 26 and 33 over and over again until it registers in your tiny brain of yours and then answer respectively.
For the record i posted these regarding a reply to your post number 23.

There i made it nice and easy for you to understand.

 

[Threepwood]

I think you are missing the point Moses.

 

[steve-h]

I suppose teachers are at fault for following the national curriculum

If they felt it was only hurting the students and doing nothing to benefit them, yes? I would hope they'd speak out against it and have the balls not to enforce whatever it may be.

Can't you see it'd be a ridiculous situation if everyone just started doing what they personally wanted/thought was the way forward?

Oh god, imagine that. People thinking for themselves and not just following orders. It would be chaos and anarchy on the streets!

 

[Ghosteh]

Oh god, imagine that. People thinking for themselves and not just following orders. It would be chaos and anarchy on the streets!

So, what if they didn't bother enforcing a law that they didn't agree with, but could effect you. Say they believed it was ok for someone to carry a knife for self protection, and they agreed with that, only for that person to end up stabbing someone you know for no reason, what then?

Are there going to be set laws that they have to enforce? Who would then decide that?

 

[Draeger]

Read post 26 and 33 over and over again until it registers in your tiny brain of yours and then answer respectively.
For the record i posted these regarding a reply to your post number 23.

There i made it nice and easy for you to understand.

Ah, ok. I see now, sorry. Thanks for letting me see the light. I'll unsubscribe from the thread and leave you in peace to continue with errrrr, whatever it is you seem to be attempting to continue with. GLHF.

 

[Threepwood]

/sigh. Changing the goal posts here.
Drug prohibition does not work. It does more harm than good for everyone involved. Waaaaay different subject matter to being allowed to carry weapons.

 

[steve-h]

They'd just be sacked. Wow, great success.

Well you took a very specific point I was making and put it in a hugely vague context and added a large margin for error. So this is what happens... o lawd teachers just doing what they feel is right and f the curriculum! compared with speaking out against something something that does nothing but harm the students who trust them.