So, what if they didn't bother enforcing a law that they didn't agree with, but could effect you. Say they believed it was ok for someone to carry a knife for self protection, and they agreed with that, only for that person to end up stabbing someone you know for no reason, what then?
Are there going to be set laws that they have to enforce? Who would then decide that?
Ah, ok. I see now, sorry. Thanks for letting me see the light. I'll unsubscribe from the thread and leave you in peace to continue with errrrr, whatever it is you seem to be attempting to continue with. GLHF.
Except for the people it stops using drugs...
If you're told to do something at work you do it, the police are no different. They don't decide on the law.
Except for the people it stops using drugs...
Cannabis has loads of negative side affects, as it stands (the organised crime behind it, physical affects, etc). A policeman deciding not to do anything if someone has weed doesn't stop that.
Read post 26 and 33 over and over again until it registers in your tiny brain of yours and then answer respectively.
For the record i posted these regarding a reply to your post number 23.
There i made it nice and easy for you to understand.
/sigh. Changing the goal posts here.
Drug prohibition does not work. It does more harm than good for everyone involved. Waaaaay different subject matter to being allowed to carry weapons.
Cannabis has loads of negative side affects, as it stands (the organised crime behind it, physical affects, etc). A policeman deciding not to do anything if someone has weed doesn't stop that.
Yes, I understand this. Many don't, but can you blame them when they have been criminalised already?However, my point was down to an officer deciding what was an appropriate law for him to enforce. It's not his decision, it's his job to enforce the law of the land, what ever that may be.
Poor attitude, especially when you're put in a position of power and trust.
How do you know the police that search you aren't speaking up? How do you know what they do when they aren't doing their job, which is to enforce the laws set by other people.
Well forgive me if I don't assume the best of the person who's forcefully rubbing my inner thighs, as good as it may feel I didn't ask for it.
Yes, I understand this. Many don't, but can you blame them when they have been criminalised already?
why do they search you so often?
It's their job. I've not been searched once, why do they search you so often?
Well forgive me if I don't assume the best of the person who's forcefully rubbing my inner thighs, as good as it may feel, I didn't ask for it.
I've known for a long long time it's illegal to buy and posses drugs, as such I always knew of the consequences should I get caught carrying. If I were ever to get caught, it was fair game.


I lolled. I've read a few of your posts, this is much more patronising than you are qualified to be.


What's freeman movement?