Youtube clip of some random and police

So, what if they didn't bother enforcing a law that they didn't agree with, but could effect you. Say they believed it was ok for someone to carry a knife for self protection, and they agreed with that, only for that person to end up stabbing someone you know for no reason, what then?

Are there going to be set laws that they have to enforce? Who would then decide that?

Well that's quite different. A knife is a lethal weapon, cannabis isn't. I don't expect them to pick and choose what they enforce as much as speak out against enforcing things that do nothing other than cause harm to people who would have been perfectly fine without their intervention.
 
Ah, ok. I see now, sorry. Thanks for letting me see the light. I'll unsubscribe from the thread and leave you in peace to continue with errrrr, whatever it is you seem to be attempting to continue with. GLHF.

Yeah and i hope the door knocks that chip off your shoulder on the way out,classic example of a typical bailout when your in the wrong and dont have the decency to admit it.

Ill see ya around in the future,must remind myself to ignore you,take care Sir.
 
If you're told to do something at work you do it, the police are no different. They don't decide on the law.

Poor attitude, especially when you're put in a position of power and trust.

Except for the people it stops using drugs...

Yes, that's my point.

Cannabis has loads of negative side affects, as it stands (the organised crime behind it, physical affects, etc). A policeman deciding not to do anything if someone has weed doesn't stop that.

organised crime behind it? NOT SURE IF SERIOUS. Prohibition causes that.

Read up on the studies and evidence for cannabis. As for "loads of negative side affects" it is a brilliant and proven form of medication for so many illnesses.
 
Last edited:
Read post 26 and 33 over and over again until it registers in your tiny brain of yours and then answer respectively.
For the record i posted these regarding a reply to your post number 23.

There i made it nice and easy for you to understand.

I lolled. I've read a few of your posts, this is much more patronising than you are qualified to be.
 
/sigh. Changing the goal posts here.
Drug prohibition does not work. It does more harm than good for everyone involved. Waaaaay different subject matter to being allowed to carry weapons.

My point is not the prohibition of drugs, as I know this does not work. I've had more than enough experience of drugs in my past, I know how it can affect people, including myself, in both good and bad ways. I personally do not support the current laws regarding drugs. However, my point was down to an officer deciding what was an appropriate law for him to enforce. It's not his decision, it's his job to enforce the law of the land, what ever that may be.
 
Cannabis has loads of negative side affects, as it stands (the organised crime behind it, physical affects, etc). A policeman deciding not to do anything if someone has weed doesn't stop that.

Ofc there is organised crime, it's illegal.... can you think of any positives the tho? And not just to do with mary jane.



However, my point was down to an officer deciding what was an appropriate law for him to enforce. It's not his decision, it's his job to enforce the law of the land, what ever that may be.
Yes, I understand this. Many don't, but can you blame them when they have been criminalised already?
 
Last edited:
Poor attitude, especially when you're put in a position of power and trust.

How do you know the police that search you aren't speaking up? How do you know what they do when they aren't doing their job, which is to enforce the laws set by other people.
 
How do you know the police that search you aren't speaking up? How do you know what they do when they aren't doing their job, which is to enforce the laws set by other people.

Well forgive me if I don't assume the best of the person who's forcefully rubbing my inner thighs, as good as it may feel, I didn't ask for it.
 
Well forgive me if I don't assume the best of the person who's forcefully rubbing my inner thighs, as good as it may feel, I didn't ask for it.

Were they any dogs around the area when you got pulled aside and searched? Because if so, the dog has probably indicated that you have the smell of drugs on you, and as such, it's the officers duty for you to be searched. It's happened to me several times, usually when I went to camden, as my mates smoke weed, it got into my clothes, and as such, I got stopped. I didn't have anything on me, so it was just a 5 minute inconvenience.
 
I've known for a long long time it's illegal to buy and posses drugs, as such I always knew of the consequences should I get caught carrying. If I were ever to get caught, it was fair game.

Yeah I hear you, tbf I've been caught and let off no bother before. Not worth the paperwork. But then, I'm a nice guy and a lot of cops are too :D

Sadly not everyone are nice :(
 
Back
Top Bottom