Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 9,258
- Location
- United Kingdom
Spot on with some of the comments above. Just a rebranded Yeti Blue at much much more expensive price. Seems crazy that anyone would bother with this Razer Mic?
Comparing Razer to Apple lolzor![]()
Seems crazy that anyone would bother with this Razer Mic?
Typical Razer. Over priced but looks good
Razer's quality isn't as good as it used to be
why?
look at it from another point of view, you have a 4770k according to your sig right?
there are many that would argue that the i5 would be a better option. yet you got the i7.
same with peripherals.
they are a premium brand with an excellent end user experience. in terms of PC hardware, they draw a lot of similarities with apple.
Blue smash the streamer industry and for good reason youve got some huge players in terms of audio this is a bad move from razer!
I honestly don't rate Razer as premium, I've had many a mouse from them and all have failed in a short period of time, like 6 to 12 months (mouse 1 or 2 gone or scroll wheel breaking or another issue). They are just very well marketed, a bit like Apple in a sense that way, but at least with Apple they truly are, or have been, a premium brand.
I'll be sure to post back the sales figues compared to the blue units when it has been in stock for a bit.
Who's arguing? We're grown ups here, right?
I didn't mention other brands because, well, I've not had any fail on me. In fact, I still use both a Logitech MX300/G1 that I've had for going on 10 years now and they're both still in tip top shape after heavy usage that they've had in Quake3/Quakelive.
Sounds pretty crackly in that video...
Well not crackly, like that sound that gets into your ears (not sure how to explain it, I'm no sound guru)
Perhaps not arguing. More disagreement maybe. I have a gen 1 deathadder, A lycosa and an original boomslang. All working. no problems to report. Its not a miracle when things work for an exrended period of time really. But your posts seem to hint that products that remain functional for many years are more premium or something.
Mentioning Logitech in the same vein as premium peripherals is pretty odd considering their main selling point is that they sort stuff out efficiently when it goes wrong.
It's not hating, they're simply helping others to save money and still get something better for 1/3 or 1/4 of the price of this razer poo...Why hate so much guys?
my mouse only lasted 7 months, yet Steelseries refused it on RMA.
Well I have no vested interest in Razer sales at OcUK, of course I used to when I worked there, I was the buyer and PM for most of the Razer products back then.
Some of you talk about how Razer products fail, this is an interesting debate and one that I'm well capable of discussing.
Razer sales were top of the tree at OCUK for mice for a number of years (whether they still are I don't know, as I no longer work at OcUK) of course when a brand is the top seller then of course you wil find more examples of faulty units, however the % of the fault was no higher than other of the other top gaming brands.
For example.
1 in 100 on Logitech
or 100 in 100000 on Razer.
Of course you most likely wont hear about the Logitech but you maye see people talk about the Razer faults more, because there are more examples, however in % terms its the SAME!
Secondly I was a buyer at OCUK for mice and keyboard for 6 years and I have been using my Razer Deathadder for about 4-5 years now and it has been fine. I have recently upgraded to a mouse that is wireless and supports 3-4 weeks on 1 single battery (AA) only reason I didnt go for the Razer Mamba is the battery life isnt nearly as good, but you can charge it on the fly.
Anyway all poo-pooing of Razer as a brand is just unfounded hear-say I think.
In terms of pricing yeah Razer may have a higher MSRP than other brands, but of course everybody in the gaming world knows who razer are, not many will know who Yeti are.... Marketing a brand costs a lot of money, and that cost has to be re-couped.
Anyone see the panaroma show earlier this week. It confirmed a iphone 6 is sold for $650 yet only costs $240 to make! At the end of the day, what about the hidden costs etc? Marketing, customer stores, experience etc, this all has a cost to it.
I'm far from an apple fan, but I see how/why companies charge a premium for their product when its a heavily marketed brand.
Why hate so much guys?