Some interesting food for thought for you guys on what gains Core i7 has actually made.
Two systems both with clock speeds of 3.30GHz, one with a Core i7 Extreme 965 coupled with 6GB the other a Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9650 with 8GB.
Both systems used 3x Nvidia GTX 280 graphics cards on benchmarks where the CPU should be the limiting factor.
Have a look at these babies:
QX9650 @ 3.30GHz
===================
i7 965 @ 3.30GHz
===================
A good little comparisson, thought it may be interesting to see what a decent clocked Core 2 rig scores with similar hardware and what it would take to match the i7 3.30GHz...
QX9650 @ 4.20GHz
===================
Even at 4.20GHz the Core 2 is still bottlenecking the graphics cards in Tri-Sli. The Core i7 gear although pricey certainly has Core 2 beaten.
From the results above to get a similar GPU score in Vantage with Core 2 as the i7 rig the Core 2 would have to be clocked at 5.10GHz or beyond.
Two systems both with clock speeds of 3.30GHz, one with a Core i7 Extreme 965 coupled with 6GB the other a Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9650 with 8GB.
Both systems used 3x Nvidia GTX 280 graphics cards on benchmarks where the CPU should be the limiting factor.
Have a look at these babies:
QX9650 @ 3.30GHz
===================
i7 965 @ 3.30GHz
===================
A good little comparisson, thought it may be interesting to see what a decent clocked Core 2 rig scores with similar hardware and what it would take to match the i7 3.30GHz...
QX9650 @ 4.20GHz
===================
Even at 4.20GHz the Core 2 is still bottlenecking the graphics cards in Tri-Sli. The Core i7 gear although pricey certainly has Core 2 beaten.
From the results above to get a similar GPU score in Vantage with Core 2 as the i7 rig the Core 2 would have to be clocked at 5.10GHz or beyond.