Because that's what they are.why do you have to say 'islamic terrorists'
Because that's what they are.why do you have to say 'islamic terrorists'
Even if they are extremists, which I am sure they are, they are still of the Muslim faith. Even if they have taken it completely out of context.
Because that's what they are.
I doubt many/any people here have any real beef with Muslims on the whole, only those that twist the religion to their own radical views and then act upon said views. Perhaps you're taking offense where there is no offense to be taken?
i understand what you say, they claim to be muslims, but they can be labeled as afghan terrorists also.
can i ask 1 question, what do you think of muslims?
I have no problem with Muslims or their faith. The same as I have no problem with Christians etc.
I agree with what some people have said. There are some crazy theories about 9/11 such as the planes were remote controlled.
Somebody said there is a video where Osama admits to 9/11. Take another look at the video. The guy barely looks like Osama, he writes with his right hand (osama is left handed according to the FBI) and he is wearing jewellery (I believe wearing jewellery is banned in the Muslim religion).
However for the last time lol please read Solving 9-11 The Deception That Changed the World. It is written by a very sane journalist who spent NINE years reasearching 9/11. The book is full of facts that can be verified. It does not contain any of the wacky theories like remote controlled planes. The author of the book is not a conspiracy theorist. He just wanted to find out what really happened and who was behind it. I think he has done that.
Oversensitive shtuff
[SKR]Phoenix;17654251 said:Wrong!
He wanted to sell books, which I bet he has by the bucket load.
However for the last time lol please read Solving 9-11 The Deception That Changed the World. It is written by a very sane journalist who spent NINE years reasearching 9/11.
It is written by a very sane journalist who spent NINE years reasearching 9/11.
Lol of course he wanted his book to sell. Do you really think he spent nine years researching his book just to make money? Why not just spend 1 - 3 years and print the book. He spent 9 years to try and make his book as factual and accurate as he thinks it could be. In my opinion is the most credible and plausible opinion on the whole 9/11 affair. You don't spend 9 years of your life researching 9/11 just to write a load of crap. That would be pointless and stupid.
They aren't all Afghans. The people behind 9/11 were from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Unite Arab Emirates and Lebanon. The 7/7 bombers were Brits (I think) of Jamaican/Pakistani decent. One thing they all have in common is Islam. They are Islamic terrorists/extremists.i understand what you say, they claim to be muslims, but they can be labeled as afghan terrorists also.
In my experience most British Muslims are no worse than most British Christians/Jews/Hindus etc.. Outside of Britain, as far as I'm aware, Islam is far more backwards thinking than any of the other major religions.can i ask 1 question, what do you think of muslims?
[SKR]Phoenix;17654251 said:Wrong!
He wanted to sell books, which I bet he has by the bucket load.
That's your perception based upon what exactly? The Daily Mail?Outside of Britain, as far as I'm aware, Islam is far more backwards thinking than any of the other major religions.