Mini Review - Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200 RPM (ST2000DM001)

Soldato
Joined
13 Jan 2004
Posts
21,205
My new 2TB drives arrived and are all installed, so how do I feel about them?

Well, first things first - neither were DOA. Reading some other reviews online saw LOTS of people complaining about DOA or degraded units arriving. It seems many people had them delivered poorly. I can see how they would die en-route as OEM drives are bare unboxed drives in static bags only.

Luckily OcUK have packaged mine to survive a military drop from a Hercules at 30,000FT so all is good here! Haribo sweets were included. :cool:

The paper specs speak for themselves:

Capacity: 2TB
Cache: 64MB
Interface: SATA 6Gb/s
Spin Speed: 7200RPM

I am running mine from SATA-II Intel ports as my SSD occupies the SATA-III interface. The 1 remaining III port could be used for a single drive but I am running my 2TB units in RAID-0, hence the need for at least 2.

I am happy to report the use of SATA-II has no impact on drive speed. Most review units benchmarked between 170-180MB/Sec Read Writes for a single drive.

How do mine scale in RAID-0? Lets see:

SG2TB_atto.jpg


100% scaling on read/write is visible here with ~370MB/sec R/W across the board as file sizes increase.

As expected small operations suffer on the write side but reads pickup to the full throughput almost from the get go. I am very happy with the throughput. This is SATA-II SSD levels of sequential R/W throughput. For drives that are solely to be used for overspill Games storage from the SSD and Data alone these are more than agreeable numbers.

Outside of the benchmark how does an actual file copy operation fare? To test I am copying a large, single file at 11GB in size from the SSD to the HDD. Let's see:

SG2TB_filecopy.jpg


Yup, plenty quick enough and mirrors the benchmark. 11GB moved from SSD to HDD platters in seconds rather than minutes. I performed a move operation on my Left 4 Dead 2 Steam install which is more indicative of a copy operation with 1,000s of files rather than 1 contiguous one.

The copy is ~52,000 Files weighing in at ~13GB. Unfortunately I used a tool to do this which does not report throughput. However, it took less than 2 minutes. Slower than a contiguous file as expected but still blisteringly quick for the best part of 52,000 files.

What about noise? As before with the DOA scare stories some people reported these as being loud. If mine were going to be loud, chucking 2 in RAID-0 would surely be a nightmare?

They are not. They are entirely silent and inaudible above my fans. (My fans are not delta screamers either!). Even when hammering 100s of GBs and 1,000s of files worth of data to them I cannot hear them. The ONLY audible element of the drive is a short sharp click when they first power on and at times rarely after booting in what I assume is the head moving onto the platters from idle states. It's a non-issue basically.

OH NOES Advanced Format 4K drives!

In short - Do not worry about it. Segate has what it calls 'SmartAlign' where the drive internally manages alignment for you.

Why would you care with other drives?

For example, Advanced Format hard drives use 4K sectors on the media, but still need to communicate to computers with legacy 512-byte sector logic. This is called 512-byte emulation and requires that physical hard drive partitions be aligned to logical partitions used by the computer. When this does not happen, partitions are said to be misaligned and hard drive performance is negatively impacted.

Why should you not care with the Seagate models with this tech?

Seagate® SmartAlign™ technology resolves Advanced Format misalignment conditions while preserving hard drive performance. Unlike other Advanced Format hard drives, Seagate drives with SmartAlign technology do not require time-consuming software utilities.


Cost? Well, we all know prices went up-up-up but I was comfortable paying the price I did from This Week Only on these drives last week.

Overall I am very happy with the drives. Silent, performance that scales in the RAID-0 on P67 Intel SATA controller and no faffing about with drive alignment tools.
 
Last edited:
I had one drop from my RAID-0 array and on checking SMART entries had some values that pointed towards a potential dodgy SATA cable. Swapped it out and it's not dropped since.

Other than the sound of the heads parking every now and then they are perfect. Bloody quick for mechanicals!
 
I had one drop from my RAID-0 array and on checking SMART entries had some values that pointed towards a potential dodgy SATA cable. Swapped it out and it's not dropped since.

Other than the sound of the heads parking every now and then they are perfect. Bloody quick for mechanicals!

Im guessing the 'clunk' is just that?
 
i get the click every now and again on my 1tb version, its a very quiet drive and very fast, had no issues with it either.

it doesnt get hot, but the fact that i have a 200mm fan blowing over it does help. awesome drive
 
Yeah.

Mine are Data not OS drives so they head park often enough that I notice them coming back to life when I access a Data folder.


Must be a Barracuda thing! I've got a older 7200.12 Barri in my gaming rig for the gaming install/data drive. The only time I hear it is when it spins up if I've been faffing about with summit else :)
 
I'm off to buy one of these tomorrow and worryingly this is the 2nd time I have heard people talk about them arriving DOA (Unless you read that on the same site as me)

My Spinpoint F3 1TB I am typing from atm is failing as I type, can't do much file wise without the machine freezing up and giving I/O errors, gone from 1 to 34 unstable sectors in 1 day and just about lets me boot (for now)

Hoping it will hold out until tomorrow so I can copy important stuff over, but not holding my breath

Would have like to have seen some Single drive benchmarks, from what I read, its a world ahead of the F3 and going from SATA II to III on a CHVF board should be a nice boost too
 
Heads up for those buying this drive. There are two different versions of the same model. 2 x 1TB platters and the slower 3 x 666GB platters. Mine turns out to be the slower 3 x 666GB. Not that fussed as it's only to be my backup drive. Only way of telling the difference is the curved indent top right. The larger indent is the faster one and seems to be made in china, and not thailand. Bit of a lottery tbh. Check this article.

http://www.techenclave.com/storage-solutions/confusion-seagate-7200-14-platter-138435/



My drive:

mUXWSl.jpg
 
Nice review. What about the seek figures.?

Seeks a bit slower on a single drive than in raid 0 but still better than my 2yr old 1TB. This review also shows the 3 platter has better seek than the 2 platter. http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/299...7200-rpm-hard-drive-test-results-hd-tune-read and the 2 platter as a slower avg read too compared to my 3 platter results.

Some HD tune runs I did when mine arrived for anyone considering the latest out the factories.

Aye, got mine yesterday and no dodgy acoustics so far.

With the increase in warranty it looks like they may now be getting better drives coming out of their rebuilt factories. That or they have almost a years worth of data to know failure rates aren't abnormally high that they can now extend it to 2 years.

I've transfered about 1.5TB accross to it. Stayed on the shipped firmware cc43. Transfer speeds are a little lower than I was anticipating, but im probably spoilt by my ssd. From its thickness the drive also looks to be a triple platter.


Edit: For anyone whose curious about their performance.

HD tune bench of the seagate 2TB

Sudden drop in performance halfway through the 2nd run not repeated in any others (I took a few to see if it was a common occurance), but figured id include it anyway.

and for reference my Hitachi 1TB drive from 2010.

Can happily report still no noisy acoustics.
 
Last edited:
Seeks a bit slower on a single drive than in raid 0 but still better than my 2yr old 1TB. This review also shows the 3 platter has better seek than the 2 platter. http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/299...7200-rpm-hard-drive-test-results-hd-tune-read and the 2 platter as a slower avg read too compared to my 3 platter results.


You're HD Tune figures are impressive. So are you basically saying I'd be better off keeping the 3 x 666 GB/platter than RMA'ing for the 2 x 1TB/platter? Doesn't make sense though, the new 2 x 1TB/platter technology is meant to be quicker. Are you sure yours is 3 platter and you have the smaller indent top right? I'm sure you're right, just wanted to ask. I haven't even broken the anti-static bag seal yet, so not even tried mine as I was about to RMA it.
 
Back
Top Bottom