Got mine higher
Extreme HD Settings - Score : 1817
EVGA GTX670 FTW @ 1006MHz core, 1654MHz RAM
i7-3820 @ Stock
-----------------------
Cyber - sorry you are being singled out here - I think its totally unfair - and thread has become a joke
to think some people on here are even worried about slight tweaks in CC etc (which I don't buy into anyway) - yet think a benchmark result is ok - if there have been artifacts throughout the run ! rightyo ...
also - people say they can't replicate this and that - all machines are slightly different otherwise we'd be running consoles
is OS the same ?same drivers ? etc etc etc - motherboard settings (PCI-E clock could be higher for instance if overclocked not just via multi, whats the main memory at etc etc)
just adding my 2ps worth
Agree with this basically, having read the whole thing objectively the arguments for him being a cheat just don't seem to make sense, firstly people say he can't have used a 4.2 bloomy to beat their faster sandy scores yet its widely being reported that the CPU isn't very important in this test and I managed to beat illuz's 4.5 ivy score using a 3.7 SB-E and lower GPU/mem clocks (I was using newer drivers /shrug).
People also said the fact he had higher memory clocks than some of the people he beat (with higher GPU clocks) was irrelevant as the memory clock didn't matter, but I bumped my memory clock up by 100MHz and saw a 48pt increase :S. Finally Proto copied his settings but with a 15MHz boost to the GPU and got 10pts less, but I have seen an 8pt difference just from running the benchmark twice back to back so that appears more like a validation of Cyper's claims than a debunk.
It's made it even worse that a few people decided to go and troll out the other forum because of this thing with Cyper as this whole thing has now ended up being damaging to this forums reputation and made its member as a whole look bad