Soldato
Looks good to me? Why do you want hideous decals and crap on a graphics card?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
Because they go faster. Obvs.
Last edited:
Associate
Last edited:
Soldato
It seems the M9 300 series has official DX12 support according to AMD:
http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-m390x-now-available-in-select-laptop-manufacturers-alienware-especially/
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9236/amd-announces-radeon-m300-series-notebook-video-cards
http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-m390x-now-available-in-select-laptop-manufacturers-alienware-especially/
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9236/amd-announces-radeon-m300-series-notebook-video-cards
Soldato
Lemme just share the naming fast
Looks like a simplified lineup.
God, that's a step backwards from the R290 design
Not if they have actually improved the cooling abilities of the reference cooler.
Associate
The 2XX ref cooler looked like a cheap plastic piece, this is much more elegant
Caporegime
One Week 
Associate
You think it's different internals and not just a new shroud? You do remember we're talking about AMD right?
Associate
What's the source of this? Thanks
Emm..i cannot tell
Associate
You think it's different internals and not just a new shroud? You do remember we're talking about AMD right?
I think AMD either upgraded the ref cooler, or just use the old design on lower end cards with low TDP, and put something other onthe higher end ones.
Soldato
So its around a third faster in compute overall than an R9 290X,but on unoptimised pre-release drivers too.
You might be right!
Edit!!
So it appears,that Fiji jas 4096 shaders,which is a 45% increase over Hawaii.
Unless AMD has cocked up somewhere this should end around Titan X level performance,but it might be even faster:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti/images/perfrel_3840.gif
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti/images/perfrel_2560.gif
You think it's different internals and not just a new shroud? You do remember we're talking about AMD right?
You might be right!
Edit!!
So it appears,that Fiji jas 4096 shaders,which is a 45% increase over Hawaii.
Unless AMD has cocked up somewhere this should end around Titan X level performance,but it might be even faster:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti/images/perfrel_3840.gif
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti/images/perfrel_2560.gif
Last edited:
Associate
Based on the TX vs 290X numbers, the two first graphs seems to be the one to look..as no gaming bench showed the TX being 2x faster than a 290X like on the last two
Associate
I see the logo, but I'm not familiar with it
It's not from a website..its genuine...but if you are THE Whycry i think of then i sent you this today morning in the news tips contact
Soldato
Lemme just share the naming fast
That list matched Sapphire retail products list:
•Sapphire Radeon R9 390X TRI-X OC 8GB GDDR5 (11241-00-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R9 390 NITRO (TRI-X OC) 8GB GDDR5 (11244-00-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R9 380 NITRO (DUAL-X OC) 4GB GDDR5 (11242-07-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R9 380 ITX 2GB GDDR5 (11242-02-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R7 370 NITRO (DUAL-X OC) 4GB GDDR5 (11240-04-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R7 370 (DUAL-X OC) 2GB GDDR5 (11240-06-20G)
•Sapphire Radeon R7 360 2GB GDDR5 (11243-00-20G)
http://wccftech.com/amd-sapphire-radeon-r9-300-series-listed/#ixzz3cYIWvoAs
So Fudzilla told the truth that Fiji XT is the water cooled one and Fiji Nano was not listed on AMD slide, here are only 2 favours XT and Pro.
- Status