• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

Soldato
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Posts
12,812
Location
Surrey
Probably hasn't passed QA yet.

Also it's not entirely clear who is to blame and what driver should have been used or was recommended to reviewers. You might even find some of them used whatever driver they had to hand in order to get the jump on other sites.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2011
Posts
20,639
Location
The KOP
Pics, have put on spoiler so if they offend thy eyes you need not look :p.

20150625_153908.jpg

20150625_154152.jpg


Comes with HDMI to DVI adaptor and high speed HDMI cable.

20150625_154221.jpg

20150625_154251.jpg

20150625_154348.jpg

20150625_154354.jpg

20150625_154431.jpg



Fan can easily be switched for pull, to be intake fan at front of case



20150625_154817.jpg


The old Blower card.

20150625_154950.jpg

20150625_155113.jpg

20150625_161038.jpg

20150625_182943.jpg

20150625_182956.jpg

20150625_183001.jpg

Stunning love the led load reading. It's also smaller than I thought.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
4,504
Location
Wales
Here's my build so far and results from FS.

Crappy IPhone pic
MM2Azh9.jpg.png


FS NORMAL

1X Fury X @stock, 5820 @4.6

Score
13957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 15750
Physics Score 18089
Combined Score 6355

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210075

OVERCLOCKED

1X Fury X @1120/500, 5820K @4.6

Score
14643 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 16521
Physics Score 17996
Combined Score 6869

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210766


Same settings but @4k

Stock

Score
3957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 3898
Physics Score 18029
Combined Score 1925

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210115

OVERCLOCKED

Score
4169 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 4112
Physics Score 18107
Combined Score 2033

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210922
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jul 2003
Posts
30,062
Location
In a house
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,543
Location
United Kingdom
Theories about the wrong driver revision used for reviews incoming.

http://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrac...y_x_possibly_reviewed_with_incorrect_drivers/

Yes, apparently the one on AMDs FTP is the wrong driver. The one that should have been used puts the cards in a better light. Not massively better but it competes with the TX more consistently

If this is true.... Beyond words.

Yep, no.

For reference on what driver strings mean by the way:
15.15-150611a-185358E (This is the real driver we provided)
15.15 - is the branch
150611 - is the date of the build, YY/MM/DD
185358 - is the build request from our system to create this driver based off the information above

In this case the review is suggesting a driver dated from June 12th 2018 and the build request that has a letter instead of a number for its last digit so it’s either a lot of typos or someone being misleading on purpose.
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,543
Location
United Kingdom
Here's my build so far and results from FS.

Crappy IPhone pic
MM2Azh9.jpg.png


FS NORMAL

1X Fury X @stock, 5820 @4.6

Score
13957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 15750
Physics Score 18089
Combined Score 6355

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210075

OVERCLOCKED

1X Fury X @1120/500, 5820K @4.6

Score
14643 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 16521
Physics Score 17996
Combined Score 6869

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210766


Same settings but @4k

Stock

Score
3957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 3898
Physics Score 18029
Combined Score 1925

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210115

OVERCLOCKED

Score
4169 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 4112
Physics Score 18107
Combined Score 2033

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210922

Looking good Reece. Just need voltage control now to unlock the full power. :)
 
Associate
Joined
1 Jul 2007
Posts
2,251
Location
United Kingdom, Scotland and Bristol
Here's my build so far and results from FS.

Crappy IPhone pic
MM2Azh9.jpg.png


FS NORMAL

1X Fury X @stock, 5820 @4.6

Score
13957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 15750
Physics Score 18089
Combined Score 6355

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210075

OVERCLOCKED

1X Fury X @1120/500, 5820K @4.6

Score
14643 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 16521
Physics Score 17996
Combined Score 6869

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210766


Same settings but @4k

Stock

Score
3957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 3898
Physics Score 18029
Combined Score 1925

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210115

OVERCLOCKED

Score
4169 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 4112
Physics Score 18107
Combined Score 2033

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210922

Looking neat and tidy there. Would pass any surprise inspection :D
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jul 2003
Posts
30,062
Location
In a house
Yep, no.

For reference on what driver strings mean by the way:
15.15-150611a-185358E (This is the real driver we provided)
15.15 - is the branch
150611 - is the date of the build, YY/MM/DD
185358 - is the build request from our system to create this driver based off the information above

In this case the review is suggesting a driver dated from June 12th 2018 and the build request that has a letter instead of a number for its last digit so it’s either a lot of typos or someone being misleading on purpose.

Gah thats a shame :(

Looking good uksoldierboy. :D
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Aug 2006
Posts
5,207
Really don't know what to think of the reviews now that people are getting a different experience from the reviewers with things such as coil whine and performance. May have to retract my comments about AMD, as it was said with frustration regarding their products falling behind Nvidia again. I really hope that I am wrong about what I said and that the owners reviews in this thread tell a different experience on the Fury.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Nov 2013
Posts
1,437
Location
Oxfordshire
Here's my build so far and results from FS.

Crappy IPhone pic
MM2Azh9.jpg.png


FS NORMAL

1X Fury X @stock, 5820 @4.6

Score
13957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 15750
Physics Score 18089
Combined Score 6355

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210075

OVERCLOCKED

1X Fury X @1120/500, 5820K @4.6

Score
14643 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 16521
Physics Score 17996
Combined Score 6869

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210766


Same settings but @4k

Stock

Score
3957 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 3898
Physics Score 18029
Combined Score 1925

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210115

OVERCLOCKED

Score
4169 with Generic VGA(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820K Processor
Graphics Score 4112
Physics Score 18107
Combined Score 2033

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5210922

My best graphics score with 290X@1280 is 14453
It is 22% more clocks, and 9% less score...if Fury can hit 1250ish clocks it could reach around 19000 graphics score after voltage unlocks....IF ppl can work out how its OC works because in the reviews somehow it not responded to OC as it should.
 
Back
Top Bottom