Associate
Oled will bring own issues like burn-in. Also oled screen still can (and sometimes do) have issues with uniformity, esp. for dark-ish grey colours.doesnt have the bleed or glow issues that bother most, like oled and so on.
Oled will bring own issues like burn-in. Also oled screen still can (and sometimes do) have issues with uniformity, esp. for dark-ish grey colours.doesnt have the bleed or glow issues that bother most, like oled and so on.
Why would businesses pay extra to remove delivery options to their customers???
Care to elaborate, which ones? In my recent experience "pro-grade" is pretty much the same in QC and CS, you pay extra for *features* (e.g. wide-gamut, hardware calibration, etc).The other way of doing it is to buy prograde monitors. These cost more for a reason. You get proper QC and proper CS.
Care to elaborate, which ones? In my recent experience "pro-grade" is pretty much the same in QC and CS, you pay extra for *features* (e.g. wide-gamut, hardware calibration, etc).
E.g. look at this "pro-grade" 21:9 Ultrasharp light bleed. I'd say exactly the same (shocking) as lot of "save on QC and hope user accepts" Acer and Asus siblings - same panel, same quality. The fact that Dell labels it "pro-grade" hardly changes anything.
Here is "pro-grade" Eizo EV3237-BK with extremely bad grey uniformity. Again, not much better than its siblings from Acer and Asus from 4K 32". And this very expensive monitor supposed to have "uniformity compensation".
I did extensive research on my new monitor recently (and went through 3), and I didn't go for "pro" monitor because its just seemed pointless - you pay more for features you don't need (wide gamut) but still the same lottery issues - no point in wasting money...
If that's the case (much, much higher chance), their average review rating should be much, much higher (and percentage of "1 stars" much, much lower). Its not, however.You clearly have a much, much higher chance of getting what's advertised if you go to Dell or Eizo than you do with an Acer or Asus.
It might help if you gave them a link to this thread. Philips customer support tried the same crap with me, trying to deny and dismiss the clearly visible color banding on my HDTV with the Computer mode. After the constant back and forth I got fed up, so I made public polls and threads (with the same sample images I had given them earlier), and gave them links to them so they can read "other people's opinions". And EVERYONE noticed the flaw right from the start. The tone of the conversation changed quite rapidly after that.
In reality, I think they knew perfectly well what was the matter, they just tried to give me the run-around. And in the end, they admitted the flaw. They probably gave up because they realized that the bad PR wasn't worth it for them. Then again, they never fixed the issue, either. Even though they said they'll forward it to the firmware team. Not that I was surprised, really. They were quite pathetic at fixing things. Usually they only managed to make things worse... Well, never gonna buy anything from Philips, anymore.
Ps. I also gave them THIS link. They said "they couldn't open it".
Monitor buying...literally ****** awful. They are all crap.
It's always the same though. People will generally buy cheap and take a chance than buy expensive and be safe in the knowledge it'll be perfect. Or at least has a higher chance of being perfect. Gamers are far more demanding than any normal, home user who will use the monitor in a brightly lit room for surfing, emails or online shopping. We expect and demand little backlight bleed, screen uniformity and good response rates. The current panel yields only give very few perfect screens and even the ISO standard allows for dead or stuck pixels!