• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Pii 955 @4.0 vs Intel core i7 [email protected]

Associate
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Posts
514
Location
Birmingham
well in coming month m goin to build a new system, as the title says, i hav 2 choices AMD 955 or Intel i7 920
i hav seen benchies of these two, and in most games AMD 955 hav taken the lead, but wt if both of these r clocked at 4.0 ghz, will AMD still take the lead,
another thing which confuses me most is that how far AMD 955 wil go on air cooling,as we hav seen i7 920 doin wonders on air cooling
if i go wid AMD thn putting 8 gb ram wil realli worth it,and help to compete against i7 920 wid 6gb?
 
Associate
Joined
25 Jun 2009
Posts
276
Location
England
Well i just done a google comparing both, and ive been set on a I7 core build myself, but after reading this then AMD 955 is route for me now, and money saved can go towards the GPU

Have a read is very interesting:)
http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=794&page=1
phenomvsi7_performance2.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
4 Jul 2009
Posts
736
Location
Perth, WA, Australia
If you're building your system mainly for gaming, general consensus is that the Phenom II is better value. The Core i7 seems to have an advantage when it comes to CPU-intensive operations (encoding is the usual example, although I'm thinking/hoping that RAW file processing falls into this category, too! ;)).
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Jan 2007
Posts
14,065
Location
.
well in coming month m goin to build a new system, as the title says, i hav 2 choices AMD 955 or Intel i7 920
i hav seen benchies of these two, and in most games AMD 955 hav taken the lead, but wt if both of these r clocked at 4.0 ghz, will AMD still take the lead,
another thing which confuses me most is that how far AMD 955 wil go on air cooling,as we hav seen i7 920 doin wonders on air cooling
if i go wid AMD thn putting 8 gb ram wil realli worth it,and help to compete against i7 920 wid 6gb?
go for amd if your a gamer

as for how far the 955 can go nobody knows, because if u get one yours may do 4.0+ghz with alittle voltage bump up where another may only do 3.6ghz

if u go for 8gb u will need to use more vcore, CPU-NB voltage which will make the OC harder.
 
Permabanned
Joined
8 Oct 2008
Posts
2,663
Location
In Lockdown England
I would have to agree. With gaming as the main usage here the Phenom 955 is the better option. Far cheaper to arrange a good setup and not really lagging much behind the i7.

I own the i7 and love it , but if I wanted to build a gaming rig the the P2 955 would be my choice.

McT
 
Associate
Joined
1 Mar 2007
Posts
594
Location
London
The i5 750 looks like it may come in at the same cost as the PII955 but with virtually the same performance as a i7920 but clock even higher. would waiit a couple of weeks and see whatthe reviews say.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
You're unlikely to get a PII much past 3.8Ghz with 100% stability so it's a moot point really.

Also in games such as World of Warcraft which are heavily CPU limited you'll get much better performance from an i7.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Posts
514
Location
Birmingham
go for amd if your a gamer

as for how far the 955 can go nobody knows, because if u get one yours may do 4.0+ghz with alittle voltage bump up where another may only do 3.6ghz

if u go for 8gb u will need to use more vcore, CPU-NB voltage which will make the OC harder.
so u suggest to stick wid 4gb? as far as OC thn i wont b pushing it so hard nt more thn 3.8ghz

and yes m a gamer, nt into encoding, but i wil do sum Photoshop stuff,
yes i agree i can save few bucks wid AMD and get 1 of those 5xxx GPUs
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
24 Jan 2007
Posts
14,065
Location
.
so u suggest to stick wid 4gb? as far as OC thn i wont b pushing it so hard nt more thn 3.8ghz

and yes m a gamer, nt into encoding, but i wil do sum Photoshop stuff,
yes i agree i can save few bucks wid AMD and get 1 of those 5xxx GPUs
example my 940 works fine at 3.7ghz with 1.46v , 2.6ghz nb 1.2v with 4gb ram, with 8gb it needs 1.5v for 3.7ghz, 2.6 nb 1.3v
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
same goes for i7? i seen most 3.4-3.6ghz

also its pot luck with ocing, he may get a good 955 clocker.

i7's will generally do 3.8 minimum with a proper heatsink, which is why OCUK sell 3.8-4ghz bundles in such high quantity.

There isn't a Phenom II@4ghz bundle for obvious reasons.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
24 Jan 2007
Posts
14,065
Location
.
i7's will generally do 3.8 minimum with a proper heatsink, which is why OCUK sell 3.8-4ghz bundles in such high quantity.

There isn't a Phenom II@4ghz bundle for obvious reasons.
just because ocuk don't have a Phenom II @ 4ghz bundle doesn't mean they can't do 4ghz+, i've seen some at 4ghz+
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Sep 2006
Posts
13,483
Location
Portland, OR
same goes for i7? i seen most 3.4-3.6ghz

also its pot luck with ocing, he may get a good 955 clocker.

That is not true, C0 steppings will do 3.8ghz minimum, more like 4....D0 can do 4 minimum with many from 4.2-4.5, even seen 4.6 under water before. STABLE, not BS benching clocks or running stupid voltages like nearly all of the 4+ghz AMD clocks.

Phenom 2 sucks at clocking. I was about to switch to Phenom 2 but trying to locate a good chip was difficult, and even then these so-called "golden steppings" only clocked to about 4ghz maximum.

People talk about bang/buck but you are best off sticking with socket 775 if you want bang/buck. A simple p45 board costs no more than a decent AMD motherboard and will clock a Q9550 or Q9650 to 4GHz and beyond.

Or even a good stepping Q6600 clocks as high as Phenom 2 and performs basically the same as well
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
just because ocuk don't have a Phenom II @ 4ghz bundle doesn't mean they can't do 4ghz+, i've seen some at 4ghz+

Likewise I've seen plenty of i7's at 4.5Ghz but it isn't reflective of what you can expect from the vast majority of retail samples with every day air cooling.

The chances of getting a Phenom II to 4Ghz without sacrificing stability are quite rare and often requires very specific conditions, if Phenoms reached 4ghz stably under air I don't see why OCUK wouldn't already be profiting from them.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
11 Sep 2008
Posts
3,322
Location
Co. Durham
Also in games such as World of Warcraft which are heavily CPU limited you'll get much better performance from an i7.

you would think but from old amd 6000+ to a 17 4.0ghz in wow there is little diff however this is down to wow as other games love my i7;)

to the op why are going quad for gaming get x3 for under £85 new wait until amd get a sure 4.0ghz clocker
 
Associate
OP
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Posts
514
Location
Birmingham
^ dnt wana spend money again and again,and as i said i want perfomance :)
second thng is that personally i havnt seen any AMD pii more thn 4.0ghz, and thats in very rare cases , most of ppl hav attained 3.8 ghz and nt more thn that,

nw my main question wz that wat wil b the perfomance difference b/w these two @ 4.0 ghz and as its been answered, ther isnt much diff b/w these two
nw is AMD future proof lyk intel? as intel wil b releasing i9 on socket 1366 ,will amd b releasing 6 core processor on same socket?
@all ,lol guyz calm down, no need to fight over these CPUs, m nt a hardcore gamer or overclocker, i w il b hardly pushing my cpu @ 4.0 or 3.8 ghz
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Dec 2003
Posts
7,213
Location
Grimsby, UK
AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.4Ghz @ 1.325v stable + Sapphire HD 4890 Vapor-X 2GB 40fps @ 1900x1200 resolution in Crysis Benchmark.

AMD is no good for Gaming is it. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom