Can someone elaborate on what's going on here?

Caporegime
Joined
26 Aug 2003
Posts
37,506
Location
Leafy Cheshire
I've been noticing random internet slowdown/dropouts at work, and seem to have found what I believe to be the cause, however a few things are confusing me about the stats (from pathping):

Code:
Windows PowerShell
Copyright (C) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

PS C:\Users\Elliott.Cummings> pathping www.jolt.co.uk

Tracing route to jolt.co.uk [84.234.17.86]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
  0  C-EF-UK-IT020.eazyfoneltd.com [10.1.2.101]
  1  10.1.2.1
  2  89-105-106-49.fluidata.co.uk [89.105.106.49]
  3  10.0.0.137
  4  89-105-125-3.fluidata.co.uk [89.105.125.3]
  5  77-89-165-25.fluidata.co.uk [77.89.165.25]
  6  77-89-165-22.fluidata.co.uk [77.89.165.22]
  7  83-223-115-33.as29017.net [83.223.115.33]
  8  ae0.core-1.lhc.lon.uk.as29017.net [89.145.125.53]
  9  linx-brocade1.netrino.co.uk [195.66.225.18]
 10  bs1-core.netrino.co.uk [84.234.19.5]
 11  bruce.ferrago.net [84.234.17.86]

Computing statistics for 275 seconds...
            Source to Here   This Node/Link
Hop  RTT    Lost/Sent = Pct  Lost/Sent = Pct  Address
  0                                           C-EF-UK-IT020.eazyfoneltd.com [10.
1.2.101]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  1    0ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  10.1.2.1
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  2    0ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  89-105-106-49.fluidata.co.uk [89.105.106.49]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  3   ---    100/ 100 =100%   100/ 100 =100%  10.0.0.137
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  4   41ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  89-105-125-3.fluidata.co.uk [89.105.125.3]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  5   26ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  77-89-165-25.fluidata.co.uk [77.89.165.25]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  6   30ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  77-89-165-22.fluidata.co.uk [77.89.165.22]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  7   28ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  83-223-115-33.as29017.net [83.223.115.33]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  8   26ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  ae0.core-1.lhc.lon.uk.as29017.net [89.145.125.53]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
  9   36ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  linx-brocade1.netrino.co.uk [195.66.225.18]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
 10   27ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  bs1-core.netrino.co.uk [84.234.19.5]
                                0/ 100 =  0%   |
 11   24ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  bruce.ferrago.net [84.234.17.86]

Trace complete.
PS C:\Users\Elliott.Cummings>

as you can see, hop 3 is obviously problematic, question are why? and how if I'm getting 100% loss, is traffic getting beyond it?
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
26 Aug 2003
Posts
37,506
Location
Leafy Cheshire
It's not loss, They are purposefully blocking Pings.
The connection actually looks pretty good there - Maybe your local WiFi or a web proxy server issue?

It's our corporate network, no WiFi involved in any step from this host. And my traffic isn't going out through our proxy, this is direct.

The problem that does seem to arise when WAN connectivity drops out is that 89.105.106.49 (our packet combiner for the three ADSL2+ lines) stops replying to pings (it usually replies).

I'm insistent that the problem lies outside of my administration and that it is with our service provider Fluidata, however they say that they see no faults.

The other thing I can't quite get my head around is why once we have hit two public hops, (89.105.106.50 and 89.105.106.49), we then appear to hit a private IP range again. I know it shouldn't cause any issues, but it seems rather odd.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
OP
Joined
26 Aug 2003
Posts
37,506
Location
Leafy Cheshire
The issue I think we are having is that the 10.0.0.x range exists on both sides of our perimeter (89.105.106.49 is the WAN address of our packet combiner, and 10.0.0.0/29 is our DMZ). Would this be causing any looping with routing?
 
Back
Top Bottom