Front fans vs front-side fans?

Associate
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Hi all, just a quick question.

Designing a case at the moment and just thinking through airflow/fan layouts.

One quick question is that I see most PC cases have intake fans at the front, ie like:

And others have them at the side of the front (sorry, don't know the correct way to describe this!), but like this:

Is there any pros or cons of these two designs?

Just wondering if airflow or anything else is affected more by one approach?
 
Associate
Joined
2 Sep 2013
Posts
1,906
I think airflow is not really impacted that much and even if it was impacted on, it'll largely be negligible unless if you have the fans are a super low rpm where barely anything is running and you only have the front(side) fans going (as it'll need to go a right angle then and not enough pressure to push it through despite the change of direction). So long as you have some exhausting out the back along with those front(side) fans, it should be comparable.

Incidentally I think it's probably going to do more for fan vibration noise (escape) than anything else as a side effect of that positioning. As whilst we can isolate fans from the case through silicone mounts, etc. The one thing you can't really stop is echoes coming out from fan mount locations (other than covering the fan spots up). And in the case of direct front to back fan positions, there's a greater amount of noise that can be let back through (front fans caused noise echoing out the rear fan for example and same in reverse as they're in roughly the same z axis). Whilst with the front(side) fan location, you have less of this, because the rear fan is aimed towards a glass (solid) front panel, and the front(side) fans are doing the same as well unlike in the traditional fan positioned case design.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Hey, thanks for this - some really clever points - totally agree on the acoustic point, that makes a lot of sense.

I'll be building out of hardwood, so think it'll be waaaay better than standard metal/glass for acoustics, but still!

Cool, think I'll design for a front-side fan intake then!!
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Sep 2009
Posts
2,864
Location
Gloucestershire
Having built both the front fan (Phanteks P400/500) and front side fan (Lian Li OD11 mini) case styles recently I would recommend 140mm where possible but especially if there's a direct path to you to reduce noise. I tend to favour at least 2 x 120mm fans in the bottom feeding the GPU which can be horizontal or vertically mounted with decent air fed to it.

Most of my builds end up with a top mounted 240mm AIO though a decent tower cooler like the Thermalright Assassin series work very well on mid-power CPUs with decent front to back + some top exit flow.

Having said that my own personal daily system is a NR200P MAX mini-ITX case with a perforated side panel. 2 x 120mm slim bottom exit fans and 2 x 140mm top exit fans through an AIO. The combination of 7800X3D + RTX 4080 both with power optimisations is the quietest system I've owned but with top notch performance. If I fit the tempered side panel then flipping the 2 bottom fans to intake as well as the top exit fans gives the best temps.
 
Last edited:
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Cool - helpful ideas!

Yes, I'm building a similar build (4090 + 7950x + 96GB + 8tb NVME) - have got :

- a 420mm AIO fan for the top
- 3 x 140mm front/side intake
- 1 x 140mm exhaust at back
- PSU self-contained intake>exhaust

Should give plenty of airflow whilst keeping negative pressure (can adjust with PWM setting if need be)
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Interesting thought - my concern would be whether this would start becoming a carpet muncher for dust?

I've posted a starter thread here for the project!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
23 Mar 2011
Posts
16,932
Location
West Side
Interesting thought - my concern would be whether this would start becoming a carpet muncher for dust?

I've posted a starter thread here for the project!
Lol.

Dust filters solve that.

I'll have a look.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Yes, was just designing a 3d printed cartridge to re-use my laddered tights! :cry: :cry:

Apparently nylon seems to outperform all the standard mesh dust filters by a mile, so I figured I'd make something to solve it - so I might take you up on that idea...! You'll see I've already got the PSU intake there, so could easily add some extras!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
12 Jul 2005
Posts
20,555
Location
Aberlour, NE Scotland
It does actually. Many of us used to knick a pair of the wife's tight's/stockings to use as dust filters back in the day. I actually only removed some from my 200mm fan filters last week as they were old and laddered and looked terrible. Unfortunately wifey doesn't buy tights or stockings anymore as she purely wears trousers so I can't knick another pair so have been trying it with the standard dust filter and it's not catching as much as the tights did.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Mar 2017
Posts
2,258
Location
Cambridge
The NV7 should give you better temps because of bottom intake.
Considering that the main offender is the GPU, feeding cool air straight to it, unobstructed, also for the PCH and the NVMEs, bottom intake is king. Side intake, at reasonable rpm/noise should be plenty to feed the AIO on the top as exhaust or an air cooler.
The 7000d Airflow, not the X, was good, the CPU cooler or top AIO won’t ever struggle with lack of cool air from front or side intake (or both). The case is huge and airflow shouldn’t be an issue, but doesn’t matter how you try, your GPU won’t ever be as cool as it would in the NV7 or any other O11D “inspired” design.
Under load should be close enough, but in the 7000d the GPU’s fans will be at higher rpm to achieve similar performance, being louder. Most decent fans at 40-50% won’t be anywhere near the GPU’s fan under load for noise.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Mar 2017
Posts
2,258
Location
Cambridge
don’t get me wrong, the 7000d is huge and you won’t struggle for airflow. My point is that the NV7 is better because of the bottom intake. The 7000d can be very close in performance, but would require higher rpm to achieve that.
Also, the fans are quite far from the motherboard and GPU so, depending on the fan used, you can still get good intake, but not as direct as one would expect. That’s more to do with the air “tunnel” created by the fan. Some fans focus on “spreading” the airflow, maybe better performance if used on radiators and heatsinks? Others, like the Arctic P12 are more centred, if that makes sense. Even at some distance, the majority of its airflow would be in “aligned” to its centre hub.
I know that most people will populate the side intake in the 5000d/7000d and remove the cover that deflect the airflow to the motherboard.
Ideally you can have most decent fans at 20-25% without being intrusive, if using the side cover. That’s plenty of airflow for everything in the motherboard and somehow moving some of the heat that most GPUs exhaust (from the side), towards the motherboard, increasing the temperature from your main NVME and the PCH.
If not using the side cover, my advice is to keep the side intake at low rpm, again 20-25% max. That should just complement the front intake, but not strong enough to deflect the front intake to the point that it won’t reach where you want.
Some people choose to use an AIO on the side, but for me doesn’t make any sense, as if using as exhaust, most of the front intake will be “used” straight away. Top exhaust fans won’t have much use there.
If using a top AIO as exhaust, you should have the best scenario. Also, go big: Arctic Freezer II 420 or any other 420mm AIO. Is a big case. Heavy. Even with dual 420mm EK 40mm thick rad, 3080 waterblock vertically mounted, the case didn’t look quite full.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
20 Jul 2007
Posts
2,049
Location
A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Yeah cool - have gone with the arctic freezer 420, so that'll be perfect I think.

Just to be clear, I'm not planning on using these cases, was just meaning as a reference - I'm planning to build one, as per:

Gotta do things the hard way..... :cry:
 
Associate
Joined
5 Mar 2017
Posts
2,258
Location
Cambridge
Yeah cool - have gone with the arctic freezer 420, so that'll be perfect I think.

Just to be clear, I'm not planning on using these cases, was just meaning as a reference - I'm planning to build one, as per:

Gotta do things the hard way..... :cry:
Amazing project.
Just to sum things up, direct airflow would allow the dedicated fans from CPU cooler/GPU heatsink to work less, as there’s another fan doing their job/helping them. Indirect airflow would offer cool air for those fans to work, but when the GPU have its fan in 0db mode, only passive cooling would occur, until the fan kicks in.
More important than direct or indirect airflow is good airflow. I’ve always used positive pressure, and only use exhaust to either help direct the flow inside the case or to remove residual heat.
As I’m using the Fractal North mesh now, front intake T30s, 40%, 2K mode. Top exhaust 20%, rear exhaust 25%. PCH temperature is 4C higher than it was in the NV7. The 4080 is reaching the same temperature, within margin of error, but to achieve that its fans are about 200rpm faster. Not a deal breaker, but as the rest of the system is dead quiet, I can notice the higher rpm.
For 99% of the time, the perfect airflow should be similar to the Torrent, which doesn’t even include a rear exhaust. Air will escape where it can, as fast as it can. You should allow the cool air to reach where you want, before exhausting it, reason why I always use the AIO as exhaust on the top.
 
Back
Top Bottom