Mornington Crescent
- Thread starter iviv
- Start date
Of course since this years problems at Carnival, Notting hill has been frowned upon under the amendment to the 2nd edition rules, section 3i Clauses 15-236
As such I will have to make a move now, begrudgingly, to Pentonville Road !
ps: think next time people...THINK!
As such I will have to make a move now, begrudgingly, to Pentonville Road !
ps: think next time people...THINK!
Sometimes not even the awesome thread-halting power of "Q F T" is enough.
Has anyone mentioned "Fairlop" yet? I'm not putting that forward as a move; it's just that it's always been my favourite
[EDIT: And while Chubby Brown's humour is not my cup of tea, I do recognise his talent as a standup - and his appearance in The League Of Gentlemen creases me up every time.]
[EDIT 2: Yes, Andrew_McP, I miss Mr Rushton, too
Christ, I'm getting like Angus with all these brackets...]
Last edited:
Oh no, didn't that get put in for an amendment last year?
I've just checked and you've invoked the Forbes-Smithen rules. Which means you must post two stations in each go unless you have a letter in your name or have seen a squirrel in the past year.
For my go (and I have seen a squirrel two weeks ago) I have decided that, unless someone has an objection under the Binary Expulsion ruleset, I will return to the original station:
Paddington.
I've just checked and you've invoked the Forbes-Smithen rules. Which means you must post two stations in each go unless you have a letter in your name or have seen a squirrel in the past year.
For my go (and I have seen a squirrel two weeks ago) I have decided that, unless someone has an objection under the Binary Expulsion ruleset, I will return to the original station:
Paddington.
Under the Pinkney-Wallis ruling you have just imparted the change of country scenario, and thus we move to Union Station, Toronto.
I'm sorry to have to impart this ruling, but if it is not called then we all face delays caused by the 'leaves on track' conundrum, brought about in section 42, paragraph c, statement iii of the second edition, third print, rules
I'm sorry to have to impart this ruling, but if it is not called then we all face delays caused by the 'leaves on track' conundrum, brought about in section 42, paragraph c, statement iii of the second edition, third print, rules
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 5,230
- Location
- The Voice Of Football
Blimey, that is unconventional given the last move. I haven't seen a move like that since the early 80's when the trend for a more 'avant garde' style of playing was adopted. Naturally, like any fad, that trend moved on and I am glad to say my playing style leans toward the more traditional. Hence, I play Tooting Bec.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2007
- Posts
- 52,812
- Location
- Tamworth, UK
You can't invoke street level rules without playing a wild card!
Well, he's had the regulation hour to correct his move, so I'm going to invoke the "Cockfosters ****-up" rule and take his turn in his stead.
I shall play London Bridge, which should be a valid wildcard under this ruleset. I score double points for a National Monument and an extra 5 points because all the words in the station name are the same length.
I shall play London Bridge, which should be a valid wildcard under this ruleset. I score double points for a National Monument and an extra 5 points because all the words in the station name are the same length.