Spec me a sleeper.

Am I a chav for turbo charging my MX5?

Of course not. It's a completely different kettle of fish. Taking a well sorted sports car (Perhaps one of the best of all time) and adding power is not the same thing as taking a Corsa 1.2 and making it go fast in a straight line.
 
Toyota Starlet GT, 1.3 = 130bhp. Could probs get it to 160/170 without costing too much.
 
[TW]Fox;10405752 said:
Of course not. It's a completely different kettle of fish. Taking a well sorted sports car (Perhaps one of the best of all time) and adding power is not the same thing as taking a Corsa 1.2 and making it go fast in a straight line.

What about taking a 1.2 Corsa and making it go fast around corners and in a straight line...?

*n
 
[TW]Fox;10405752 said:
Of course not. It's a completely different kettle of fish. Taking a well sorted sports car (Perhaps one of the best of all time) and adding power is not the same thing as taking a Corsa 1.2 and making it go fast in a straight line.

You know my comment was meant to be facetious right?! ;) :p
 
For me the appeal of a sleeper has nothing to do with traffic light grand prix. It's about driving something that's got some real oomph even though it looks perfectly innocuous.
 
What about an ex top of the range late 90's Volvo 700 series turbo estate fitted with a new turbo like the one in the back of my car:

IMG_2228.jpg
1940/50 era Ford Pop??
 
[TW]Fox;10405752 said:
Of course not. It's a completely different kettle of fish. Taking a well sorted sports car (Perhaps one of the best of all time) and adding power is not the same thing as taking a Corsa 1.2 and making it go fast in a straight line.

mx-5.... sportscar? what have you been sniffing? :p
 
[TW]Fox;10405925 said:
MX5 is a textbook Sports Car.

I guess i'm thinking of the image problem it has. FWIW a sports car to me would be something sportier. i.e. a bigger engine and basically quicker...

it looks like a sportscar but without the go. however Freefaller has rectified what i thought was lacking on an mx-5 to turn it from a poser car to something sporty. :)
 
I don't care what Fox says, how pointless it is, or how stupid it is to put a Ford engine in a Nissan, thats an AWESOME sleeper.

100% agree with that....

best sleeper i seen was a 450bhp 4x4 sierra estate. :) had little 15" alloys on it and aside from the cossie bumpers looked stock. even down to the crap blue paintscheme if i remember correctly.
 
[TW]Fox;10405976 said:
A traditional sports car, though, was not about power.

it's about performance.... performance is directly related to engine power, and indirectly related to weight and shape.

a combination of these gives performance and in my eyes makes a car a sports car or a wannabe. :)
 
A sports car does not require a large, powerful engine, though many do have them. Some classic British sports cars lacked powerful engines, but were known for exceptional handling due to light weight, a well-engineered, balanced chassis, and modern suspension. On tight, twisting roads, such an automobile performs more effectively than a heavier, more powerful luxury car with less maneuverability.

An MX5 is a Sports Car. a BMW M5 is not. One is powerful and very fast. The other is not. The two factors are not related.
 
it looks like a sportscar but without the go. however Freefaller has rectified what i thought was lacking on an mx-5 to turn it from a poser car to something sporty. :)

Yeah it was one thing that it needed was more power - at around 200bhp and around 200bhp/tonne it's about where it should be :) Actually it's pretty flippin' awesome! :D
 
Forget the age of the car, and get a Dolimite Sprint with classic car insurance.
Car and insurance should cost <£2000, and you`ve got plenty left for repairs and maintainence.
 
Back
Top Bottom