Goth who walks fiancée on a leash is banned by bus driver who told: 'No dogs allowed'

They're attention seekers, so while this proved an inconvenience since they couldn't get the bus home/to the shops, they loved it.

Why else would they be in such a configuration? Goths are bigger posers than chavs, most people just aren't smart enough to see it that way. :rolleyes:
 
badbob said:
Who are you to say it's degrading, when she's made the choice to wear it? Do you think a woman wearing a g-string bikini is degrading? Perhaps she should wear a Burka?
Click to expand...

I wonder how long they've been going out and how young she was she this guy, her elder, decided he fancied her. Girls can be very impressionable at certain ages.
 
Mohinder said:
Would it be that difficult for them to just drop the ****ing put-apon creative weirdo act just for ten minutes?
Click to expand...

To be fair, I get your point, but tbh it does sound like the bus driver was being a bit of a cockrel nonetheless. And quite frankly I welcome human pets any day of the week, over inhuman chavs at least.
 
seek said:
To be fair, I get your point, but tbh it does sound like the bus driver was being a bit of a cockrel nonetheless.
Click to expand...

That he was, I've said above that I think all three of them are, as you put it, cockrels.

But... I mean come on, the guy's 25. Time to put the Cradle of Filth albums away and give into growing up like the rest of us have done.
 
It's all an act of attention seeking, look-at-me, I wanna be different and stand out and be noticed.

Psychologists would have a field day explaining what's going on inside their heads...

"Well, he's a megalo-maniacal total-control oriented absolute-power thirsting attention seeking freak, and she's an idiot"

:p :D
 
I thought there was a law about imprisonment/restraint was still illegal even if you consented. Something to do with Stockholm syndrome or that might be America :confused:
 
badbob said:
Who are you to say it's degrading, when she's made the choice to wear it? Do you think a woman wearing a g-string bikini is degrading? Perhaps she should wear a Burka?
Click to expand...

There's nothing degrading about women wearing a bikini it's clothing, a dog lead on the other hand is a symbol of power where he is the master.

To be quite honest she needs her head examining and if this is normal to them they shouldn't be allowed to breed.
 
[TW]Fox;10950691 said:
'm purely saying it's not against the law and in theory is completely permissable from a legal perspective.
Click to expand...

I agree there. Anyway, I don't have any more to add until Arriva comment themselves.
 
mmj_uk said:
There's nothing degrading about women wearing a bikini it's clothing, a dog lead on the other hand is a symbol of power where he is the master.

To be quite honest she needs her head examining and if this is normal to them they shouldn't be allowed to breed.
Click to expand...
I missed this post.

How on Earth can you justify your last statement?

Are you opposed to males being dominant (or submissive) in the bedroom? Or the Kitchen? Or when paying bills?

It's just an extension outside. I doubt seriously she is unhappy, in fact, I'd bet the extreme opposite.
 
mmj_uk said:
There's nothing degrading about women wearing a bikini it's clothing, a dog lead on the other hand is a symbol of power where he is the master.

To be quite honest she needs her head examining and if this is normal to them they shouldn't be allowed to breed.
Click to expand...

To prudes, g-strings are degrading to women. And to Muslims a mini skirt and boob tube is offensive.

However it is that persons right to wear whatever clothes they like, as long as not exposing there genitals (unless it's a nudist beach) Bunch of intolerent and short minded people here:rolleyes:

Would you agree that a bus driver refusing someone with tattoos is ok too? (as long as not KKK, Swastika etc)
 
Their appearance does not offend me and they may well be a nice couple to chat to and that's from a 61 year old persons point of view but I do take offence at them being on benefits and intending on starting a family while other tax paying people support them. Being on benefits should not be a choice but a last resort.

I was in the Army from my teens until my late 20's then left because of injuries suffered. I managed to carry on working and supporting myself, wife and son until my late 40's then had to retire and go onto full disability benefits because my condition had deteriorated and after suffering two heart attacks my doc said work was no longer an option.

I detest being on benefits, wish I could work even at my age as I miss the routine and friendship even after all these years but beside my lack of mobility and pain I also have difficulty dealing with anything that presents the slightest problem or causes stress. I do attempt to do small task from home but each morning I wake up never knowing if I'm going to be well enough to get through the day without spending most or a large part of it on Morphine.

I'm very grateful for the benefits I do get but it does annoy me when I see or read of hard working people like most members here having no choice but to pay toward supporting what appears to be a young fit and healthy couple whom I'm sure can work if they put their mind to it. :mad:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom