Tbh, I hardly think that 1-0 was going to be a terrible result even with the away goal rule.
The Return of The Champions League - *SPOILERS* - 19/20 Feb
- Thread starter Ripper
- Start date
Tbh, I hardly think that 1-0 was going to be a terrible result even with the away goal rule.
But can play a similar role as Rooney, and one of the best finishers ive seen for a long, long time.
Although, that Benzema does look good. Perhaps a more of a target man is needed? Toni/Berbatov type. I think Huntelaar would be class.
Wow, imagine us playing football when we took Scholes and Giggs off.
Next time don't try to tell me I'm wrong.
I think Giggs is quite ineffective now, but i think Scholes is still quality, imo. But should be more of a rotational player now.
1-0 would have been a far worse result that it looks on paper. With the away goals rule had they scored at OT you'd have needed 3.
He's a talent but too often he goes missing in games.
Arsenal should have won that game! Specially at the end there
Yeah we was all over milan 2nd half, just hope we play the same at the san siro although milan are playing pants at the san siro this year
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 15 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 28,140
- Location
- Liverpool
Arsenal should have won that game! Specially at the end there
Hit the ******* bar. WTF!?!? Why couldn't we score just one, just one sodding goal. None of our shots even tested the Milan keeper apart from Eboué's chance early in the second half, others' were either wide or straight at him.
FFS. Nothing sodding changes - dominated a match and failed to put it past them. Really ******* off atm. We're going to Milan with nothing on the score sheet and now we're going to lose. ****'* SAKE!!!
1-0 would have been a terrible result. Even a 2-1 loss would have been a considerably better result. Had it stayed 1-0 then we would be ****** if they sneaked a goal at OT.
Well i can tell you that tonight he ran rings around Vidic and Ferdinand. He was fantastic! He would be an asset to any Premiership side.
Indeed. I don't make stuff up when I talk. Giggs launced in at least EIGHT (at the last count on the OSD). Nani comes on, launches ONE in and it causes chaos, his cross from the corner (as it came back to him eventually) creates a goal. It's not a coincidence.
We carry Giggs and Scholes these days. Neither track back for us and there's not an ounce of pace between them. They just can't fit in with the pace we should be playing at.
Look at that stat saying distance ran, Kallstrom ran almost 2 miles more than Scholes. And that was just after he'd been subbed off.
I hope i'm wrong, but i just get the feeling Giggs is only in the side to break Charlton's appearance record now.
Look at that stat saying distance ran, Kallstrom ran almost 2 miles more than Scholes. And that was just after he'd been subbed off.
I hope i'm wrong, but i just get the feeling Giggs is only in the side to break Charlton's appearance record now.
He looked good for the goal and looks to have a lot of potential, but I didn't see him running rings round anyone tonight. His goal was good because he took it quickly, its not as if he ran round 3 players though. Great talent and he'll only get better, shame he'll cost 25m+ though.
