Hi guys,
Well, I've been a numpty and damaged my lovely 7900GS while fitting an aftermarket cooler (generates artifacts even at stock speeds and below 50 degrees at load)
Now seeking the most budget-conscious replacement that isn't a downgrade, with an eye to keeping the system as quiet as possible (spends more time not gaming than gaming). Don't really play anything heavy, mostly just World of Warcraft (stop laughing please), which currently runs at 1920x1200, max details, 2x AA, a feat which I would be loathe to lose.
£100 is my guide price, £130 is really the most I want to lay out.
Been debating a 1950 Pro, or an 8600GT, but am basically overloaded by graphics card information every time I look, and can't work out which is better, and whether either are an improvement on the 7900GS I'm losing
Everyone says the 8800GT is the no-brain medium-power graphics card of the month, but the £160 (assuming a quiet cooling model) cost is a bit of a kick right now. Would considering a 256 MB model for £30 less be silly?
Thanks for any advice!
Eddie
Well, I've been a numpty and damaged my lovely 7900GS while fitting an aftermarket cooler (generates artifacts even at stock speeds and below 50 degrees at load)

Now seeking the most budget-conscious replacement that isn't a downgrade, with an eye to keeping the system as quiet as possible (spends more time not gaming than gaming). Don't really play anything heavy, mostly just World of Warcraft (stop laughing please), which currently runs at 1920x1200, max details, 2x AA, a feat which I would be loathe to lose.
£100 is my guide price, £130 is really the most I want to lay out.
Been debating a 1950 Pro, or an 8600GT, but am basically overloaded by graphics card information every time I look, and can't work out which is better, and whether either are an improvement on the 7900GS I'm losing

Thanks for any advice!
Eddie