How much do you think his daughter would have got if her parent had remained married. If I were a multi-millionair I’d be spending a whole lot more than that on her education alone. Why should she suffer just because her parents got a divorce?6.25 Million per year, also the daughter get's 35K a year !
Because she was his wife, not his business partner.McCartney obviously made all his money before he met her, I can't understand why she got so much!
Because she was his wife, not his business partner.
And thereby made no contributions to his wealth. Indeed, she had sizeable property holdings of her own, money from a successful modelling career and god knows what else. What percentage of this did Paul get?Because she was his wife, not his business partner.
How much do you think his daughter would have got if her parent had remained married. If I were a multi-millionair I’d be spending a whole lot more than that on her education alone. Why should she suffer just because her parents got a divorce?
I thought that was explicitly obvious in my less then disguised sarcasmZero, he's a man!
Oh well, Apple are supposedly willing to pay up to $300,000,000 to Paul if he allows them to sell the Beatles on iTunes.
I don't see why people are getting annoyed about it.
Who cares about their divorce anyway. What she gets is irrelevant to most of us.
Wa wa wa waaa my daughter wont be able to fly in first class. I'll have to pay for it, humpf. So unfair, waa. <cue the huge-manitee picture>
Courts can take into account when monies were gained, she didn't help him earn any of it.
I suppose he's waiting for better exchange rate![]()
Why should she suffer just because her parents got a divorce?